Calcutta High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

NOMINAL INDEXHasin Jahan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 152Smt. Kajari Karmaker @ Kajari Marick vs. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 153Shri C. Chitambaram Versus The Director of Transport Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 154Super Smelters Limited v United Cables Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 155Hemanta Kumar Das Vs. Union of India & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 156ARCL Organics Ltd. Versus Stressed Asset Stabilization Fund. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 157Shri Praveen Jain And Anr. vs.Tulsan Properties Private Limited And Anr Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 158Tarun Kanti Naskar vs. State of West Bengal & Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 159Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary v. Steel Authority of India and Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 160Sreepad Bhiwaniwala v. Grant Thornton US Knowledge and Capability Center India Pvt. Ltd. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 161Sanjoy Kumar Doloi & Anr. -vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 162Commissioner of Service Tax Kolkata v. M/s Medicare Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 163Bimla Devi Jaiswal v. M/s Indus Towers Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 164Ripan Biswas Vs. Union of India & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 165Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central-1, Kolkata v. Rungta Mines Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 166Avirup Talukdar v. Avishek Talukdar & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 167Krishnawathi v. Union of India & Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 168M/s BESCO v M/s Hindon Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 169Rasan @ RaisanHansda @ Raison Hansda -Versus- The State of West Bengal Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 170Bibek Paria & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 171STATE OF WEST BENGAL v Vs. SURAJIT DEB AND OTHERS Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 172Kaberi Dey & Ors. Vs. Sourav Bhattacharjee Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 173Tutu Ghosh Vs. Enforcement Directorate Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 174Tumpa Basak vs. Tufan Basak Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 175Dilip Hari vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 176AB v REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATH, CHANDERNAGORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 177Murshidabad Zilla Parishad v Asian Care Development Private Limited and Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 178The State of West Bengal Vs. Fagun Mandi @ Pui and Another Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 179Precept Talent Management Limited v. Sourav Chandidas Ganguly Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 180ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS BERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 181THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Vs. RADHA KANTA BERA Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 182Subhrangsu Panda Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 183Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Limited v Marine Craft Engineers Private Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 184X v State of West Bengal Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 185EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs AMARA RAJA ENERGY AND MOBILITY LIMITED Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 186ORDERS/JUDGEMENTSCalcutta High Court Orders Cricketer Mohammad Shami To Pay ₹4 Lakh Per Month As Maintenance For Estranged Wife & DaughterCase: Hasin Jahan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 152The Calcutta High Court has asked Indian cricketer Mohammad Shami to pay his estranged wife and daughter Rs 4 lakh per month as maintenance in his ongoing legal tussle against Hasin Jahan, his estranged wife.Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee held: "...Interim monetary relief as fixed by the Court below requires revision. The opposite party/husband's income, financial disclosure and earnings established that he is in a position to pay a higher amount. The petitioner wife who has remained un-married and is living independently with the child is entitled to a levelled maintenance that she enjoyed during her continuance of marriage and which reasonably secure her future as well as future of the child. In my considered opinion a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- per month to the petitioner no.1(wife) and Rs. 2,50,000/- to her daughter would be just fair and reasonable to ensure financial stability for both the petitioners, till disposal of the main application."Gazette Notification Is Mandatory Under CCS Rules For Recognition Of Name Change To Claim Family Pension : Calcutta HCCase Name: Smt. Kajari Karmaker @ Kajari Marick vs. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 153A single judge bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) held that a Gazette notification is mandatory for recognition of a name change of a government employee or their family member for pensionary benefits. Further affidavits and newspaper publications alone are insufficient to meet this procedural requirement. Illegal Termination Violating Natural Justice Mandates Reinstatement, Not Mere Compensation:...

Calcutta High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Srinjoy Das