Madras High Court Monthly Digest - October 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 296 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 334 NOMINAL INDEX The Director General of Police v D Jayakumar, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 296 The Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women (Autonomous) v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 297 Major General AK Gupta v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 298 Selva Muthukumar and Others v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 299 AS Shanmugha Rajan v Tamil Nadu Cricket Association and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 300 S Gurumurthy v S Doraisamy, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 301 Feeback Infra Pvt Ltd v. MSEF Council, Chennai – W.P. No. 25062 of 2023, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 302 SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 303 TTF Vasan @ Vauikunthavasan v Inspector of Police, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 304 M/s.Kaleeshwari Refinery Private Limited v Akshay A, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 305 G Moorthi v The Recovery Officer, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 306 Ilampiraiyan v Mr Pethi @ Thirumalai Raja and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 307 IDFC Limited Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 308 The Chennai District Collector and Others v T.V.S.Jaya Perumal (Died), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 309 N Ponnupillai v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 310 G Venkatesh v Bridge Federation of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 311 Arjunan Sampath @ Arjun Sampath v The Sub-Inspector of Police, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 312 R Kumaraguru, Ex MLA v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 313 Praveen Kumar v The Additional Chief Secretary and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 314 Shreya Bhattacharya v Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 315 Dr.J.Kaja Moinudeen v The Authorization Committee (Transplantation), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 316 Tamil Nadu Football Association and Others v Pennar Junior FC and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 317 Dr Vinith v State and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 318 Mr K Ramachandran v The Principal Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 319 Tamil Nadu All Village Panchayat President Welfare Association v State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 320 Raja Desingu v The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 321 Sutherson v The Deputy Superintendent of Police and Another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 322 V Senthil Balaji v The Deputy Director, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 323 B Mubeena v The State and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 324 N.Uganchand Kumawat v The Inspector of Police, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 325 M/s Jayapradha Cine Theatre v. Employees State Insurance Corporation, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 326 G.K.Reddy Versus DCIT, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 327 Jemima Arumaithai and Another v The Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 328 Barakathullah and Others v Union of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 329 P Prathap Kumar Nayak v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 330 S.Rajasekaran @ Satta Rajasekar v The State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 331 Dr.Pradeep Vasudevan v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 332 Enforcement Directorate v TTV Dinakaran, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 333 The Additional Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s.N.C.Alexander, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 334 REPORTS Employee’s Suspension Cannot Extend Endelssly Without Disciplinary Proceedings Merely Due To Pendency Of Criminal Case: Madras High Court Case Title: The Director General of Police v D Jayakumar Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 296 The Madras High Court has recently observed that in cases where employees were suspended from service in connection with a crime, the suspension cannot continue endlessly without initiating disciplinary proceedings merely due to pendency of criminal case. The bench of Justice R Suresh Kumar and Justice K Kumaresh Babu observed that the employers could not continuously take a stand that it is not conducive to revoke the suspension of the employee while pendency of the criminal case. The court added that in every quarter of the year, the employer is to review the necessity for extending the suspension. SC/ST/OBC Reservation Does Not Apply To Minority Educational Institution, But Intake Of Minority Students Cannot Exceed 50%: Madras High Court Case Title: The Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women (Autonomous) v The State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 297 The Madras High Court recently observed that the policy of reservation for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes cannot be implemented in Minority educational institutions. The bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audikesavalu relied on the precedents laid down by the Supreme Court and reiterated that the exclusion of Minority Institutions from the ambit of Article 15(5), which empowers the state to make provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward communities, is not violative of Article 14 as minority institutions are a separate...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - October 2023

Upasana Sajeev

Tags