Madras High Court Monthly Digest - October 2024

Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 371 To 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 414 NOMINAL INDEX K Sethuraj v State of Tamil Nadu (and other connected cases), 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 371 Suo Motu v The Deputy Commissioner of Police, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 372 M/s.Sterling Futures and Holidays Ltd. v Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 373 AR Dairy Food Private Limited v The Central Licensing Authority – Tamil Nadu, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 374 G Prem Kumar v District Collector, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 375 The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) Commercial Taxes Department v. M/s. Supreme Coaters & Fabricators, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 V.Kannan @ Kanal Kannan v State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 377 TR Ramesh v The Commissioner, HR & CE and others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 378 P Pappu v The Sub Registrar, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 379 S.Srinivasan v The Assistant Director, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 380 M/s. Aqua Excel v. The State Tax Officer (Adjudication), Office of Commercial Tax Officer, Tirunelveli, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 381 Muthukumar v State and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 382 M.S. Mohamed Siddique & Co. v. The Assessment Unit/Verification unit/ Technical Unit/Review Unit Income Tax Department, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 383 Harris Jayaraj v The Joint Director and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 384 K.A.Meeran Mohideen v Sheik Amjad and others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 385 Abdul Gani Raja v The State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 386 Jacob v The State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 387 The Assistant Director (PMLA) v Ashok Anand, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 388 Tmt.S.Sindhu v Tamil Nadu State represented by Drugs Inspector, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 389 A Shankar and Another v RS Bharathi, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 390 Veera Bharathi v The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 391 G.Shrilakshmi v Anirudh Ramkumar, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 392 P. Ananda Kumar v The Director General of Police (Prison) and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 393 S Porkodi v The Secretary to Government of India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 394 Ahmed Mansoor and Others v The State and Another, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 395 N. Manoharan v G Sivakumar and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 396 The Management v. R. Parthiban, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 397 Himanshu Pathak v Ministry of Electronics and Information and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 398 Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. Offshore Infrastructures Limited, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 399 MRB Nurses Empowerment Association v. The Principal Secretary and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 400 Rev.Fr.Savarimuthu and Others v V.S.Jeyapandi, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 401 The Director, Directorate of Medical Education and Research and Others v Jubil Timothy and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 402 The Regional Officer, NHAI v K Vasuki and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 403 S.Harikumar v The Presiding Officer, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 404 M/s Challani Rank Jewellery and Others v Ashok Kumar Jain, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 405 Mr.Muthuvelaydha Perumal Appavu @ M.Appavu v RM Babu Murugavel, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 406 ABC v. XYZ, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 407 Mahalingam Balaji v. The Secretary and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 408 The Assistant Director v The State and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 409 K Jayakumar v The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 410 DMK ICF Labour Union v. Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 411 Suo Motu v The Deputy Superintendent and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 412 S Kalavathi v State and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 413 R v B, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 414 REPORTS Madras High Court Gives Nod To RSS Route March Proposed For Sunday, Says State Flouted Order Laying Down Guidelines For Future Marches Case Title: K Sethuraj v State of Tamil Nadu (and other connected cases) Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 371 The Madras High Court on Tuesday permitted the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to conduct its proposed route march on the occasion of Vijayadasami. A single judge bench of Justice G Jayachandran permitted the route marches to be carried out as per the earlier guidelines issued by the High Court in January this year for conducting the route marches. The court had also commented that despite detailed guidelines of the court previously, the government had flouted the orders forcing the organisers to approach the court again. The court also orally remarked that the police were expected to protect the public as well as the organisers and could not avoid giving permissions for such permissions for route marches citing law and order problems. The court said that it expected the police in the state to follow the court orders at least in the future and not trouble the court by inventing new and fanciful reasons for rejection. Madras HC Orders CBI Probe Into Sexual Abuse Of Minor After Her Parents Allegedly Beaten Up By Police, Audio Clip Of Victim's Statement Leaked Case Title: Suo Motu v The Deputy Commissioner of Police Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 372 The...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - October 2024

Upasana Sajeev

Tags