Madras High Court Monthly Digest - September 2025 [Citation 293 to 329]

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 293 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 329 NOMINAL INDEX Raja Mathan and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (292) S. Vijay v. The Commissioner of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 293 Thirumalaisamy v. The State of Tamilnadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 294 Women Lawyers Association of Nilgiris v. The Secretary and others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 295 K.J. Vinod v. Registrar, NCLT & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 296 Edappadi K Palanisamy v. S Suriyamoorthy and others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 297 Dr Ilaiyaraja v. Mythri Movie Makers, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 298 R Kannan and Others v. T.R Baalu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 299 Annadhurai Ramasamy v. The Chief Secretary, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 300 Tarigonda Surya Maheedhar v. The Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 301 Lokeshwaran Ravi v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 302 Adv V Venkata Sivakumar v. The Election Commission of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 303 R Varadaraj v. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 304 Vignesh D v. The Health and Family Welfare Department and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 305 ST Sivagnanan v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 306 N Anand Bussi Anand v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 307 D Chandirasegar and Others v. Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 308 Sarootham Padmanabhan v. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 309 T Devanathan v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 310 Suo Motu WP v. The Director General of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 311 P Ayyakannu v. Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 312 Vanniyakulachathiriyar Nala Arakattalai v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 313 R Sathish v. The Inspector of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 314 A. Kasthuri v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 315 Ulpath Nisha v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 316 Mohammed Iqbal v. S Manonmanian, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 317 VP v. M, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 318 SGS and another v. NIL, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 319 Secretary to Government Education Department State of Tamil Nadu & Ors vs J. Augustin & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 320 M/s.Sivakumar and Co., Perundurai Road, Erode v. The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 321 M/s. Inalfa Gabriel Sunroof Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Customs Authority for Advance Ruling, Mumbai, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 322 K Immanuvel @ Keynos Armstrong v. Superintendent of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 323 M. R. Yajith Krishna v. Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 324 RAP v. AM, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 325 Cakes N Bakes v. The Commercial Tax Officer, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 326 S Venkatesan v. Sundaram Fasteners Limited, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 327 K Balachenniappan v. Jeyakrishnan, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 328 A.G Ponmanickavel v. State and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 329 REPORTS 'Understand Constitutional Values': Madras HC Asks Hindu Munnani Workers To Write Preamble 10 Times For Pre-Arrest Bail In Hate Speech Case Case Title: Raja Mathan and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (292) The Madras High Court has recently granted anticipatory bail to Hindu Munnani workers in an alleged hate speech case. Interestingly, the bail has been granted on the condition that the accused write the preamble of the Constitution, along with Article 19 (Freedom of Speech), Part IV-A, Article 51A which pertain to fundamental duties 10 times either in Tamil or Hindi and submit it before the Magistrate court. Justice M. Jothiraman imposed the condition to make the accused understand the object and constitutional valued enumerated in the Constitution. Madras High Court Constitutes Commission Led By Retd Judge To Probe Allegations Of Police Violence Against Detained Lawyers Case Title: S. Vijay v. The Commissioner of Police Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 293 The Madras High Court on Tuesday (September 2) constituted a 'one-man commission' headed by retired high court judge Justice V Parthiban to probe into allegations of police violence during the detention of lawyers and law students who took part in the protest organised by the sanitation workers of Greater Chennai Corporation. The bench of Justice MS Ramesh and Justice V Lakshminarayanan asked the Legal Services Authority to provide assistance to the commission. The commission has been directed to probe into the allegations levelled by both parties and submit a report by the next date of hearing. The lawyers and law students had alleged that the police had used excessive force while detaining them. The state, on the other hand, had argued that the protestors had caused damage to public and private property. People's Mindset Must Change To Eradicate Caste Discrimination In Using Public Resources: Madras High Court Case Title; Thirumalaisamy v. The...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - September 2025 [Citation 293 to 329]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags