'Adverse Effect Of Climate Change Will Be On Nation's Future' : Supreme Court Stresses Importance Of Forest Protection

A week after recognizing for the first time the fundamental right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change, the Supreme Court has delivered another judgment highlighting the potential adverse impacts of climate change.The judgment cited a report published by the Reserve Bank of India titled “Report on Currency and Finance; Towards a Greener Cleaner India” (2022-23), which, the Court said, presented a "very disturbing scenario.""The report clearly suggests the enormous potential impact of climate change on the society, leading to serious job losses in every sector. Therefore, the adverse effect will be on the future of the nation as a whole, as against an identifiable group," the Court observed.The judgment quoted from the RBI report as follows :"Climate change manifested through rising temperature and changing patterns of monsoon rainfall in India could cost the economy 2.8 per cent of its GDP and depress the living standards of nearly half of its population by 2050 (Mani et al., 2018). India could lose anywhere around 3 per cent to 10 per cent of its GDP annually by 2100 due to climate change (Kompas et al., 2018; Picciariello et al., 2021) in the absence of adequate mitigation policies. Furthermore, Indian agriculture (along with construction activity) as well as industry are particularly vulnerable to labour productivity losses caused by heat related stress (Somnathan et al., 2021). India could account for 34 million of the projected 80 million global job losses from heat stress associated productivity decline by 2030 (World Bank, 2022). Further, up to 4.5 per cent of India's GDP could be at risk by 2030 owing to lost labour hours from extreme heat and humidity conditions."In this backdrop, the Court discussed the importance of forest protection. "A difference of one and half degree Celsius in temperature saves the global economy tens of trillions of dollars," the Court said. The Court observed that a country with excess forest cover would be in a position to sell its excess carbon credit to the one in deficit.On April 8, a 3-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in the case MK Ranjitsinh And Ors. v. Union of India, recognized for the first time the right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change.“The right to equality under Article 14 and the right to life under Article 21 must be appreciated in the context of the decisions of this Court, the actions and commitments of the state on the national and international level, and scientific consensus on climate change and its adverse effects. From these, it emerges that there is a right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change. It is important to note that while giving effect to this right, courts must be alive to other rights of affected communities such as the right against displacement and allied rights.,” the judgment authored by CJI DY Chandrachud in MK Ranjitsinh stated.Importance of forest protectionIn the present case (State of Telangana and ors vs Mohd Abdul Qasim), the Bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and SVN Bhatti underscored the significance of the forest for the survival of diverse forms of life.“Human beings indulge themselves in selective amnesia when it comes to fathom the significance of forests. It is the forests which give life to the Earth by replacing carbon dioxide with oxygen, thereby providing a hospitable environment for the steady growth of diverse life forms. It's the spirit of the forest that moves the Earth. History shall not be understood from the jaundiced eyes of humans but through the prism of the environment, the forest in particular.”, the Judgment authored by Justice MM Sundresh said. The court highlighted how the developmental activities of humans are inadvertently destroying the humans themselves, where despite taking selfless motherly service from the forest, the humans are continuing to destroy the forests. “Forests not only provide for and facilitate the sustenance of life, but they also continue to protect and foster it. They continue to tackle the ever-increasing carbon dioxide emissions produced by humans in the name of development, while striving to sustain all species. Despite the unblemished, selfless and motherly service rendered by forests, man in his folly continues with their destruction, unmindful of the fact that he is inadvertently destroying himself.” The court indicated that rather than the affluent class, the vulnerable class who are dependent on the forest's resources are most affected by the destruction of forest cover. “It is the vulnerable sections of the society who would be most affected by the depletion of forests, considering the fact that the more affluent sections of society have better access to resources as compared to them. Therefore, the protection of forests is in the interest of mankind, even assuming that the other factors can be ignored.” Observing that the forests serve the Earth in a myriad of ways ranging from...

'Adverse Effect Of Climate Change Will Be On Nation's Future' : Supreme Court Stresses Importance Of Forest Protection

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

'Adverse Effect Of Climate Change Will Be On Nation's Future' : Supreme Court Stresses Importance Of Forest Protection

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers