You Searched For "Indian Contract Act 1872"

S 171 Contract Act - Bank Can't Retain Title Documents After Repayment Of Loan Citing Pendency Of Another Loan : Bombay High Court

A bank cannot retain title documents of a borrower's house after repayment of a loan, citing general lien on documents, merely because of pendency of another loan, the Bombay High Court has held. ...

Contract Act Does Not Recognize Sale Of Pledged Goods By Pawnee To Self : Supreme Court

The same principle applies to the pledge of shares under the Depositories Act, the Court held.

Electricity Act Will Not Apply When Contract Is For Supply Of Materials Simplicitor, Court Can Apppoint Arbitrator: Allahabad High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Proviso (v) To S.14(1) SARFAESI Act

Breach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State To Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount

Refusal Of Contractor To Execute Work Unless Reciprocal Promises Are Met By Other Party Can't Be Termed Abandonment Of Contract : Supreme Court

Insurance Policy Condition Barring Filing Of Claim After Specified Time Period Void As Contrary To Section 28 Contract Act : Supreme Court

Liquidated Damages Recovered For Delay In Completion Of Project Attracts 18% GST, Rules Telegana AAR

Subordinate Legislation/Statutory Rules Also A 'Law' Under Section 23 Contract Act: Supreme Court

Clause Barring Payment Of Interest Not Hit By Section 28 Contract Act : Supreme Court

Validity And Enforceability Of Electronic Contracts And Electronic Signatures

Banks Can't Force Mandatory Claim Period Of 1 Year For Bank Guarantees : Delhi High Court Interprets Exception 3 To Section 28 Contract Act

The Doctrine Of Waiver In Indian Contract Law

Drafting Non-Disclosure Agreements : A Legal Critique

The Click-Wrap Conundrum And WhatsApp's New Policy

To Arise A Right Under Bank Guarantee Agreement, Demand Has To Be Made Within Validity Period Of Agreement : Kerala High Court

'Legal Framework Around Blockchain Technology Applications'- Justice Prathiba Singh

[Force Majeure] Taking Cue From Courts: What Worked, What Didn't

Doctrine Of Frustration Under Section 56 Of Contract Act Not Applicable To Lease Agreements : Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

[Contract Act] Sec 32 Instead Of Sec 56 Applies When Parties Agree In Advance On Contingency Which Makes Performance Impossible : SC