![Theft during 1984 Riots: Apex Court permits 93-year old Accused to Walk Free[Read the Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/SC.jpg "Theft during 1984 Riots: Apex Court permits 93-year old Accused to Walk Free[Read the Judgment]")
Theft during 1984 Riots: Apex Court permits 93-year old Accused to Walk Free[Read the Judgment]
12 Jun 2014 5:41 PM IST
Madras High Court declares Section 21 of the Bonded Labor System (Abolition) Act Unconstitutional
4 Jun 2014 3:05 PM IST
Delhi High Court drops Ammunition Charges against New York City Cop
25 May 2014 6:23 PM IST
![High Court cannot endevour a hyper-technical approach for quashing FIR; SC [Read the Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/sc.jpg "High Court cannot endevour a hyper-technical approach for quashing FIR; SC [Read the Judgment]")
Letter of MLA – Is it not Contempt of Court?
3 May 2014 5:08 PM IST
RIL moves Delhi HC; Seeks Quashing of FIR by AAP Govt on Gas Pricing
3 May 2014 11:21 AM IST
![Supreme Court issues fresh guidelines on quashing of proceedings of a non-compoundable offence on the basis of settlement between the parties. [Read the Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/SC-11-LL-Size.jpg "Supreme Court issues fresh guidelines on quashing of proceedings of a non-compoundable offence on the basis of settlement between the parties. [Read the Judgment]")
![Breaking News: Time limit for registering FIR extended from 7 days to 15 days; Supreme Court modifies Lalita Kumari Norms [Read Order]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/First-Investigation-Report.jpg "Breaking News: Time limit for registering FIR extended from 7 days to 15 days; Supreme Court modifies Lalita Kumari Norms [Read Order]")
Breaking News: Time limit for registering FIR extended from 7 days to 15 days; Supreme Court modifies Lalita Kumari Norms [Read Order]
8 March 2014 7:05 PM IST
![Omitted Section 438 Cr.P C for anticipatory bail [in UP] cannot be resorted to as back door entry via Article 226, Says Supreme Court.](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/sc-bail.jpg "Omitted Section 438 Cr.P C for anticipatory bail [in UP] cannot be resorted to as back door entry via Article 226, Says Supreme Court.")
Omitted Section 438 Cr.P C for anticipatory bail [in UP] cannot be resorted to as back door entry via Article 226, Says Supreme Court.
20 Jan 2014 12:48 PM IST
![SC quashes proceedings against accused smuggling mobile in to prison as there was no prohibition at the time of commission [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/prison-story.jpg "SC quashes proceedings against accused smuggling mobile in to prison as there was no prohibition at the time of commission [Read Judgment]")
SC quashes proceedings against accused smuggling mobile in to prison as there was no prohibition at the time of commission [Read Judgment]
20 Jan 2014 9:33 AM IST
Tejpal Bail Application; Jurisdictional Issues
27 Nov 2013 9:34 PM IST