You Searched For "IBC"

Corporate Debtor Cannot Be Sent Into Liquidation Just Because Liquidation Value Is More Than The Value Of The Resolution Plan: NCLT Kolkata

NCLT Kolkata Bench comprising Shri Rajasekhar V.K. (Judicial Member) and Shri Balraj Joshi (Technical Member), while deciding interim applications in the matter of Ramsarup Industries Ltd., has held ...

NCLT, Delhi Declares Supertech As Insolvent And Appoints IRP

The Delhi bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) consisting of PSN Prasad (Judicial Member) and Rahul Bhatnagar ( Technical Member) admitted the plea of Union Bank of India over ...

Failure To Reply To Demand Notice U/S 8(1) Within 10 Days Does Not Preclude The Corporate Debtor From Raising The Existence Of A Dispute In A S. 9 Application: NCLAT, New Delhi

Proceedings U/S 95 Of The IBC Shall Abate On Death Of The Personal Guarantor: NCLT, New Delhi

Whether Claim Of License Fee For Use And Occupation Of Immovable Premises Is An Operational Debt U/S 5(21), IBC? : NCLAT Refers To Larger Bench To Consider

Decree Holders As Creditors Under The IBC - Need For Clarity

Suspended Board of Directors Has No Power To Replace RP Under IBC: NCLAT, Chennai

Personal Guarantors Of NBFC/FSC Cannot Be Proceeded Against Unless Threshold Of Rs. 500 Cr Is Satisfied: NCLT, Jaipur

Initiation of CIRP Not Mandatory For Maintainability Of An Application Against Personal Guarantors U/S 95, IBC: NCLT, Kochi

Constitutional Validity Of S.7 Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code Challenged Before Rajasthan High Court; Notice Issued

Investor Or Creditor? – The SEBI V. IBC Battle

Entry In Balance Sheet Amounts To Acknowledgment Of Liability: NCLT Kochi

In IBC Proceedings, Penalty Can Be Imposed Only Under The Code And Not Under The Companies Act: NCLAT

90 Days Period Under Regulation 32A Of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations Directory, Not Mandatory: NCLT Hyderabad

Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Constitutionality Of S.95 IBC

NCLT Mumbai Dismisses Application U/S 9, IBC On The Ground Of Existence Of A Principal-Agent Relationship Between The Parties

No Scope For Negotiation Once The CoC Has Approved The Resolution Plan: NCLAT In DHFL Case

Advanced License Fee Is An Operational Debt And Notice U/s 138 NIA Is Not A Dispute Under IBC: NCLT, Delhi

Holding The Resolution Plan To Be Discriminatory, The NCLAT Sets Aside The Plan For Piyush Shelters India Pvt. Ltd

After Approval By The Adjudicating Authority, The Resolution Plan Is No More A Confidential Document: NCLAT