Provisions Of Foreign Trade Policy Cannot By Itself Authorise Levy Of Interest U/S 28AA Of Foreign Trade Act: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court stated that the provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy cannot by itself authorise the levy of interest under Section 28AA of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, as such levy must be supported by plenary legislation. The Bench of Justice Gopinath P. was considering a case where the assessee challenged the interest imposed upon him under the provisions of Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on the amounts repaid by the assessee on the assessee being found ineligible for the benefit of the Scheme introduced by the Foreign Trade Policy. In this case, the assessee was considered eligible and was granted a duty credit scrip as rewards in terms of Chapter 3 of the Foreign Trade Policy (2015-2020) formulated for Service Exports from India in order to encourage/maximise export of certain notified services. However, on the basis of certain audit objections, the competent authority found that the assessee was not entitled to the benefit of the Scheme. According to the competent authority, the services rendered by the assessee could not be considered as 'placement and supply services of personnel'. Therefore, the assessee was required to remit back the amount covered by the duty credit scrip issued to the assessee. The said amount was paid by the assessee. Later, the assessee was informed that he is also liable for interest under the provisions of Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The assessee submitted that since the provisions of Section 28AA of the 1962 Act have not been made applicable by any provision in the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, the demand for interest in terms of the provisions contained in Section 28AA of the 1962 Act cannot be sustained. The department submitted that when the policy clearly specifies that the provisions of Section 28AA of the 1962 Act will apply it is not open to the assessee to contend that the amount of benefit obtained by him is not liable to be refunded together with interest calculated in terms of the provisions of Section 28AA of the 1962 Act. The bench stated that “there is no provision of the 1992 Act under which Foreign Trade Policy has been framed has been pointed out to show that the provisions of Section 28AA of the 1962 Act have been made applicable for levying interest on any person who is found ineligible for any benefit received under the terms of any Scheme under the Foreign Trade Policy.” The bench held that the provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy cannot by itself authorise the levy of interest under Section 28AA of the 1962 Act as such levy must be supported by plenary legislation. The assessee is not liable to pay interest under Section 28AA of the 1962 Act on the amounts repaid by the assessee on the assessee being found ineligible for the benefit of the Scheme introduced by the Foreign Trade Policy which was in force for the period from 01-04-2015 to 31-03-2020, added the bench. In view of the above, the bench allowed the petition. Case Title: Braddock Infotech Private Limited v. Joint Director General Of Foreign Trade Case Number: WP(C) NO. 16812 OF 2024 Counsel for Petitioner/ Assessee: John Varghese and V. Thulaseedharan Pillai Counsel for Respondent/ Department: Achuth Krishnan R.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Ker) 779 Click Here To Read/Download The Order

Provisions Of Foreign Trade Policy Cannot By Itself Authorise Levy Of Interest U/S 28AA Of Foreign Trade Act: Kerala High Court

Mehak Dhiman

Tags