Supreme Court Faults UCO Bank's Attempt To Stall Employee's VRS By Issuing Show Cause Notice

Any objection to voluntary retirement without initiating disciplinary proceedings wouldn't survive to stall the voluntary retirement, the Court said.

Supreme Court Questions Insurance Company For Not Filing Complaint Over Forged Policy; Orders SIT Probe

While dealing with a case of insurance policy fabrication, the Supreme Court recently ordered Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu to constitute a Special Investigation Team to probe the matter.A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and R Mahadevan passed the order with a view to ensure that Insurance Companies, which deal with substantial amount of public funds contributed by...

Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Quashed At Pre-Trial Stage Once Section 138 NI Act Ingredients Are Met : Supreme Court

“Once the ingredients of S 138 of the N.I. Act are satisfied by the complainant, the rebuttal of statutory presumption can only be made during trial.”

Personal Hearing Of Borrower Not Necessary Before Banks Declare Account 'Fraud' : Supreme Court Clarifies 'Rajesh Agarwal' Verdict

Opportunity of hearing doesn't mean oral hearing of the borrower, the Court said.

West Bengal SIR | 'ECI Could Not Furnish Reasons' : Appellate Tribunal Restores Deleted INC Candidate To Voter List

Acting on the Supreme Court's direction to decide his plea urgently, the Appellate Tribunal for Special Intensive Revision in West Bengal on Sunday set aside the deletion of Indian National Congress candidate Motab Shaikh's name from the electoral roll.The Tribunal, headed by former Calcutta HC CJ Justice TS Sivagnanam, observed that the Election Commission of India could not place the...

Judgment Allowing Women Entry In Sabarimala Temple Wrong: Centre Tells Supreme Court In 9-Judge Bench Reference

During the hearing of the Sabarimala reference, the Union Government on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the 2018 judgment permitting entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala temple was wrongly decided and deserves to be declared a wrong law.Appearing for the Union, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted before a 9-judge bench that the 2018 ruling requires reconsideration...

NEET PG 2025-26 : Supreme Court To Hear Pleas Challenging Cut-off Reduction On April 28

The Supreme Court will hear the batch of pleas challenging reduction in the cut-off percentile for NEET-PG 2025-26 on April 28, 2026.On the previous date, a bench of Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe had said it would examine whether the sharp reduction in the qualifying percentile for NEET-PG 2025-26 affects standards in postgraduate medical education.Today, Senior Advocate...

India Not Patriarchal Or Gender Stereotyped As The West Understands : Solicitor General To Supreme Court In Sabarimala Reference

"India has always treated women equally; we have always treated them at a higher pedestal," SG submitted.

Supreme Court Questions Non-Implementation Of National Commission For Allied & Healthcare Professions Act; Summons Officer

The Court flagged the non-implementation of the Act passed in 2021 for 5 years.

CCTVs In Police Stations | Attorney General Assures Supreme Court Of Positive Steps In 2 Weeks

In the suo motu case concerning lack of functional CCTV cameras in police stations, Attorney General R Venkataramani today assured the Supreme Court that positive steps would be taken within 2 weeks.Representing the Union Home Secretary, whose personal presence was directed by the Court yesterday, the AG said he has taken stock of the matter and will hold meetings with the Amicus Curiae...

'There Can't Be Untouchability For 3 Days A Month', Justice Nagarathna On Article 17 Application In Sabarimala Case

"Speaking as a woman, Article 17 can't apply for 3 days and on 4th day, there is no untouchability!" Justice Nagarathna said.

S.528 BNSS | Criminal Proceedings Can Be Quashed When Reliable Material Disproves Allegations : Supreme Court

The Court quashed the criminal proceedings after the CCTV footage showed that the appellants were not involved in any violence.