'Adani Group Cases Listed Before SC Bench Violating Its Own Procedure' : Dushyant Dave Alleges In Letter To CJI [Read Letter]

Senior Advocate and former President of Supreme Court Bar Association Dushyant Dave has written a letter to the Chief Justice of India alleging that cases with high commercial stakes for Adani group were irregularly listed before a particular bench in violation of the Supreme Court practice and procedureThe letter begins with statements made by four judges, including the present CJI Ranjan Gogoi, during the press conference of January 2018 that "there have been instances where cases having far reaching consequences for the nation and the institution have been assigned by the Chief Justices of this Court selectively to the benches of 'their preference' without any rationale basis for such assignment".Lamenting that the administration of the Supreme Court has worsened even after the public outcry by four senior judges, Dave cited two cases of Adani group, which were listed during before vacation bench during recent summer break, allegedly in violation of the SC procedure.Despite there being no special urgency in the matter, these two cases were hastily heard and disposed of by the vacation bench in May 2019, ignoring the requests for adjournments made by counsel for the parties, alleged Dave's letter, which is now being widely circulated among lawyer groups.The first cited case is a 2018 civil appeal by Parsa Kenta Collieries Ltd, which is a part of Adani group, filed against a Rajasthan High Court judgment in favor of Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd (Civil Appeal 9023 of 2018). As per the letter, though the special leave for the appeal was granted only in August 24, 2018, the matter was listed during summer vacation for hearing. Dave referred to the entries stated to have been made by the Registrar R K Goel on March 14, 2019 that the case was not ready for hearing. On May 21 and 22, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra and M R Shah heard Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in the matter and reserved judgment. "I am informed that the other counsels appearing in the matter were neither informed nor their consent was obtained for the same", Dave said."Did the bench inquire into its urgency? Seems not. Did the bench take up other matters for hearing which were older and urgent? Seems unclear", he remarked.The second case mentioned by Dave is a 2011 civil appeal titled Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd vs Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others(Civil Appeal 11133 of 2011). On May 23, the same bench entertained a 2019 petition filed for early hearing of the matter, and listed the case for hearing the next day. The previous listing of the case was in February 2017.On May 24, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Surya Kant reserved arguments in the case after hearing Senior Advocate Gopal Jain for the appellant and Senior Advocate M G Ramachandran for the respondent.Quoting Ramachandran, Dave stated that on May 23, the Advocate on Record for the respondent had made a request for not taking up the matter during the vacation citing the unavailability of the Senior Advocate who was briefed in the case. Rejecting this request, the bench listed the case for final hearing the next day. Even on May 24, a request for adjournment was made on behalf of the respondent. But the bench chose to hear the case straightaway, stated the letter.The Court ultimately granted relief to Parsa Kenta and Adani Power in both the matters."I am told that the total benefit to this Corporate Client from these two judgments will run into thousands of crores", Dave said. He disclosed in the letter that he had appeared as a lawyer for Adani group in past, including in the case of Parsa Kenta Collieries before Rajasthan HC."Clearly, hearing and disposal of these two appeals have been done in complete contravention of the settled practice of the Supreme Court as also its established procedure. Both these matters were listed, taken up and heard without any justification, and in hurry and in an improper manner. As a result, besides causing grave injury to public interest and public revenue, it has caused immense damage to the image of the Supreme Court and the administration of justice. It is disturbing that the Supreme Court of India should take up regular matters of a large corporate house during summer vacation in such a cavalier fashion and decide them in its favour", he said."It raises very serious and disturbing question as to whether the Registry had sought concurrence from the Hon'ble Chief Justice for listing such matters and if not whether the Registry became party to such listing in violation of its own practise and procedure.But most of all, why were the two matters listed before the bench presided by Hon'ble Mr Justice Arun Mishra when other benches were available during May 2019 vacation?And why did this Bench take up the same", he asked.Apart from these two, Dave cited two other cases involving Adani group, which were listed and heard by benches headed by Justice Mishra.On January 29,...

'Adani Group Cases Listed Before SC Bench Violating Its Own Procedure' : Dushyant Dave Alleges In Letter To CJI [Read Letter]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

'Adani Group Cases Listed Before SC Bench Violating Its Own Procedure' : Dushyant Dave Alleges In Letter To CJI [Read Letter]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers