Arnab Goswami And Republic TV 's Plea Against Mumbai Police's FIR In TRP Scam: Live Updates From Bombay High Court [Day 3]

J Pitale - You at best seem to be suspects as of now. You are not accused. You say quash the proceeding, what is quashed? against whom? when you are not accused 

J Shinde - See Bhajanlal's case. The second category. If the offence, on its face not made out the HC can interfere. 

J Shinde - When you have invoked our jurisdiction, are we supposed to wait for the investigation even after three months?

Mundargi - Even if the two are divorced, unless and until there is a specific material you can prosecute us just because we are connected to a company.

Now about malafies

Mundargi - Now I can show the malafies have fallen on the merits of the case, making evidence doubtful. They should be juxtaposed

Mundargi - The January report (relied on by the CP during the press conference) doesn't show anything incriminating against us.

J Shinde - Please focus on the merits

J Pitale - The July report is the forensic analysis of this report (January 2020). There is no beginning or end to it.

Mundargi says that BARc vigilance officer was there at the time of registration of FIR.  

J Pitale- How is everything marked to an officer below the IO ?

Mundargi - As it is this particular unit is handled by Sachin Waze.   

Mundargi says then Mumbai CP Parambir Singh mentioned this report in the October 8 press conference.

Mundargi - There are no names mentioned to say from where they get all the information