Arvind Kejriwal's Challenge To ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court

Singhvi: They are concealed and suppressed by ED, by not placing in prosecution complaint. Because they made the complaint long!? when it's inculpatory, it doesn't make complaint long?

Singhvi: There is nothing showing use, projection. On 16.09.2022, no allegation against Kejriwal. He says I don't know all these people. After 5 months, this chap is arrested on 11 Feb. He makes 4 statements.

Singhvi: Now come to son Raghav. He is son of an MP...now a candidate himself.

J Khanna to Raju: what he is saying is that grounds of arrest must also refer to facts that are in his favor. you may be right, it's his contention. we don't know

Singhvi: 17 July statement to complete exclusion of marked statement. All is hearsay! This is not a word about Kejriwal. Magunta is saying Kavitha told him. He told son. Son met Kavitha. Nothing about Section 3 PMLA

Singhvi: First statement of MSR was in March...ignored

Singhvi: ED's entire case is 6-7 people. Let me show grounds of arrest...how Magunta Reddy is sought to be connected to me (Kejriwal)

Raju interjects

J Khanna: It's unfortunate even before us sometimes arguments are made which you know won't cut us

Singhvi: It contradicted earlier statement. Son Raghav granted bail the very next day! ED gave concession...so generous. On 10 August, interim bail made absolute.

Singhvi (coming back to MSR statement): 5 months down the line, due to son's continuous incarceration, father broke down. to secure no-objection for son's bail, on 16-17 July, MSR gave statement seeking to implicate Kejriwal

J Khanna: Reason to believe has been used in number of ...I think Vjay Madanlal says something different

Singhvi: Supreme Court has said we hold and justify more anti-liberty because of higher threshold in section 19 PMLA