Bhima Koregaon Case Accused Gautam Navlakha Disputes NIA's Claim For Rs. 1.64 Crore Towards House Arrest Surveillance Expenses

In a courtroom exchange that unfolded at the Supreme Court on Thursday (March 7), Bhima Koregaon-accused Gautam Navlakha's counsel, Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, accused the National Investigation Agency (NIA) of engaging in what she described as 'extortion' by demanding an excessive amount from the human rights activist towards meeting his house arrest expenses. The septuagenarian has been in custody since August 2018 for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 after being arrested in connection with the 2018 caste-based violence that broke out at Bhima Koregaon in Pune, and for allegedly furthering the agenda of proscribed far-left outfit Communist Party of India (Maoists) and conspiring to overthrow the government. He has been under house arrest since November 2022, following the apex court's intervention.This heated exchange occurred during a hearing where the human rights activist's plea for shifting his house arrest location in Mumbai was being considered, alongside the NIA's plea challenging a Bombay High Court order granting him bail in December last year. While issuing this verdict, the high court had suspended the operation of the bail order for three weeks. This stay was extended by the Supreme Court in January.A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and SVN Bhatti was presiding over the two cases.The last hearing of Navlakha's plea was deferred to allow the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to file a counter-affidavit in response to his request for a shift in location. During the courtroom exchange, Additional Solicitor-General SV Raju once again reiterated the central agency's concerns over the order of house arrest. In response, the bench revealed that it had 'reservations' about the November 2022 order, passed by a bench led by now-retired Justice KM Joseph, allowing Navlakha to be released from detention and placed under house arrest on grounds of his deteriorating health. Such an order, the court orally observed, might set the 'wrong precedent'.During the hearing, ASG Raju also claimed that Navlakha is now required to pay one crore to meet the expenses for round-the-clock surveillance at the location where he is housebound. This figure, was however disputed by Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the embattled activist. She argued that the central agency's calculation of the amount payable was wrong and contrary to the relevant rules. Besides this, she also informed the bench that a deposit of eight lakhs had already been made by Navlakha towards surveillance and security expenses in terms of the court's order in April.Today, Ramakrishnan reiterated her objections to the NIA's monetary claim. She argued that the agency's demand for the payment of – now said to have exceeded one crore and sixty-four lakhs – from Navlakha was not correct, pointing to alleged inconsistencies when tested against extant rules and regulations governing such payments.She said, “We have contested this amount and the matter needs to be heard.”To which, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, representing the probe agency, responded by insisting that Navlakha must first make the payment, highlighting that he has only paid ten lakhs so far.Their tense exchange escalated as Ramakrishnan exclaimed, “They cannot demand one crore from citizens for keeping them in custody.”The ASG retorted, “Citizens are not entitled to house arrest. Besides, they have agreed to make the payment.”Ramakrishnan, however, continued to challenge the NIA's position, accusing the agency of 'extortion' – “There is an upper limit. The rules state...Tax I pay, and I earn no money. Even by their own rules, this is not…And therefore there cannot be extortion. A poor man can never...”However, the law officer quickly objected to the use of the term 'extortion', denying any such actions by the agency.Ultimately, the judges intervened, reasoning that the dispute over the amount claimed by the National Investigation Agency would have to be adjudicated in a proper hearing. Accordingly, they directed the matter to be adjourned to a non-miscellaneous day in April. The stay on the Bombay High Court's bail order will continue until then. BackgroundGautam Navlakha, an activist and senior journalist, along with 15 others have been accused by the National Investigation Agency of being responsible for the January 2018 caste violence at Bhima Koregaon in Pune, although one of them – Jesuit priest and tribal rights activist Father Stan Swamy passed away in July 2021.The Pune police and later, the NIA contended that inflammatory speeches at Elgar Parishad – an event to commemorate the two hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Koregaon Bhima – triggered the violent clashes that broke out between Maratha and Dalit groups near the village of Bhima Koregaon in Maharashtra. This led to the 16 activists being arrested for allegedly conspiring and planning the violence and charged with various provisions of the Unlawful Activities...

Bhima Koregaon Case Accused Gautam Navlakha Disputes NIA's Claim For Rs. 1.64 Crore Towards House Arrest Surveillance Expenses

Awstika Das

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Bhima Koregaon Case Accused Gautam Navlakha Disputes NIA's Claim For Rs. 1.64 Crore Towards House Arrest Surveillance Expenses

Awstika Das

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers