Can Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appeal To Supreme Court Against TDSAT Order Under AERA Act ? SC Reserves Judgement

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (September 24) reserved its judgement on the issue of maintainability of appeals before itself by Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) assailing orders of the TDSAT under the AERA Act 2008. The bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra was hearing a challenge to the decision of Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal which held that Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) does not have powers to impose tariffs on Ground Handling Services (GHS) and Cargo Handling Services (CHS) conducted by Specific City Airport handling companies (like Delhi / Mumbai International Airport Limited) or their contractors.The Tribunal also held that under the AERA Act 2008, GHS and CHS are to be considered as 'Non-Aeronautical Services' and thus beyond the tariff imposition powers of AERA.The issue framed by the Court for consideration was :"Whether an appeal against an order passed by TDSAT in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction under S.18 of the AERA Act 2008 can be maintained at the behest of AERA?"S.18 of Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) Act 2008 provides that the Centre or State government or local authority or any person may appeal to the TDSAT (Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal) for adjudication of any dispute under S.17(a).S.17(a) lists the subject matters of dispute as follows :(a) adjudicate any dispute-(i) between two or more service providers;(ii) between a service provider and a group of consumer:Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may, if considers appropriate, obtain the opinion of the Authority on any matter relating to such dispute;Notably, S. 17(a) bars dispute with regards matter under jurisdiction of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission; Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum; Competition Act, 2002 and appeals under section 28K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. Senior Advocates Arvind Datar and AM Singhvi appearing for the Airport handling companies (DIAL/MIAL) contested the challenge to maintainability of the present appeal by AERA. It was mainly argued that that since the Govt of India had entered into private agreements with the respondents, the issue pertains to contractual obligations before the coming of the AERA Act 2008. The AERA cannot file an appeal in 'public interest' and was not a regulator to determine GHS and CHS tariffs ASG N Venkataraman appearing for AERA countered this by relying upon the statement of objectives of the 2008 Act. He stressed that as per the objectives of the 2008 Act, AERA has a duty towards public in creating level playing field, fostering healthy competition, encouraging investments and regulating tariffs. He underlined that well-being of the passengers was part of the larger public interest. " At least the people who have created us certainly call us regulators. Creating level playing field, fostering healthy competition, encouraging investments and regulating tariffs...for whom? for each one of the passengers - section of representation of the public- are we going to say they are not 'public interest?'" The AERA, the appellants before the Top Court, have relied upon S.13(1)(a)(iv) and (v) of the 2008 Act which states powers to determine tariffs for aeronautical services into consideration - economic and viable operation of major airport and revenue received from services other than the aeronautical services.During the hearings, the CJI noted if the TDSAT has considered AERA to be a necessary or proper party, then the present appeal of AERA may find merit on maintainability. "S. 13(i)(a) provides the manner in which the tariff is to be determined. When the determination of tariff by AERA is the subject matter of an appeal under S.18 , AERA is a respondent, because the Court has called upon to justify the basis on which you have imposed tariff. Once we come to the conclusion that either you are necessary or proper party before TDSAT, then once a decision is rendered by TDSAT there is nothing to exclude your right to file an appeal." The bench also said that it will be delivering separate judgements on the issue of maintainability and then on the main questions of law raised after examining the merits in the main appeal. The counsels for the parties were also directed to sit together and identify the common issues of law to be raised. "There will be two separate judgements. We will deliver the judgement on maintainability. Once we deliver on maintainability, you can tell us how long you will take on merits. Another thing, is it possible to identify issues on merits and then tell us broadly which are the issues which are common to all " What Are The Facts Leading Up To The Present Challenge?Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL) had entered into a contract with Airport Authority of India (AAI) for Operation, Management and Development (OMDA) of Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI) in 2006. Another agreement was ...

Can Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appeal To Supreme Court Against TDSAT Order Under AERA Act ? SC Reserves Judgement

Anmol Kaur Bawa

Tags