Top Stories

[Breaking] Delhi HC Rejects Plea Challenging Ban On Army Officers Using Social Media

Karan Tripathi
5 Aug 2020 5:11 AM GMT
[Breaking] Delhi HC Rejects Plea Challenging Ban On Army Officers Using Social Media
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday rejected a plea challenging the policy of the Indian Army which requires all members of the armed forces to delete their social media accounts.

The Division Bench of Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Justice Asha Menon has dismissed the petition on merits.

The order has come in a plea moved by Lieutenant Colonel PK Choudhary challenging an order of the Director General of Military Intelligence, requiring all personnel in the Indian Army to delete Facebook, Instagram and 87 other social media applications.

The petition was filed by a serving lieutenant colonel, who said that he was finding it difficult to connect with his family which resides outside India, in the absence of access to social media.

He had submitted that he uses his Facebook account responsibly in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Indian Army from time to time, and he has never shared any classified or sensitive information pertaining to his role and duties as an Indian Army officer over Facebook or any other social networking platform.

"Soldiers rely on social networking platforms like Facebook to address various issues arising in their families while posted in remote locations and often use the virtual connect to compensate for the physical distance existing between themselves and their families," the plea stated.

It was contended that the ban violates various fundamental rights of the Petitioner under the Constitution, including the right to freedom of speech and expression and right to privacy, whereas the power to modify fundamental rights of members of armed forces rests with the Parliament alone.

"Article 33 permits the Parliament, by law, to modify fundamental rights by members of armed forces i.e, Soldiers. The Respondent No.1 is not the Parliament. Ban on use of social networking platforms and order to delete accounts vide the Policy is an attempt by the Respondent No.1 to usurp and assume powers which are vested exclusively with the Parliament in terms of Article 33," the Petitioner argued.

It was also submitted that the restrictions contained in the Policy, particularly relating to ban on use of social networking platforms and deletion of accounts therein are not contemplated under Section 21 (Power to modify certain fundamental rights in their application to persons subject to this Act) of the Army Act, 1950 and or the Rules framed by the Central Government in terms of the said provision.

The Petitioner had pointed out that while on one hand Soldiers are ordered to stop using all major social media platforms and to delete their user profiles, on the other hand the Respondents are formulating plans to sensitise soldiers and train them in proper and safe conduct over social networking platforms.

"Such contradictions in the Policy are a testament to the non application of mind while formulating the same," the Petitioner remarked

Further, it was contended that the policy is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution inasmuch as there are several members of the civil administration and political class who possess information of a much higher level of sensitivity than a regular soldier. However, no restrictions on use of social media apply to the said persons.

The Petitioner had therefore prayed the High Court to direct the Respondent to withdraw its "draconian" Policy dated June 6, 2020, to the extent it precludes the army personnel from using social media or requires them to delete their accounts.

He had also sought a declaration that Director General of Military Intelligence is not empowered under the constitution or under any other law to modify, amend or abrogate the fundamental rights of the members of the armed forces.

The plea had been filed through Advocates Shivank Pratap Singh and Sanandika Pratap Singh.

Click here to download judgment

Next Story