ED Plea In Calcutta High Court Against Mamata Banerjee : Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

14 Jan 2026 2:42 PM IST

Share this

ED Plea In Calcutta High Court Against Mamata Banerjee : Live Updates

Listen to this Article

The Calcutta HighCourt is heading the plea by the ED alleging interference by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee during raids at the offices of the I-PAC pertaining to a 2020 coal scam.

The agency alleges that the CM took away important documents while the raid was ongoing.

The Trinamool Congress has also filed a plea stating that the ED took away election-related documents from the offices of the poll consultants who are advising the state's ruling party on strategy for the upcoming Bengal assembly elections.

A bench of Justice Suvra Ghosh is hearing the matter. Follow this page for live updates.

Live Updates

14 Jan 2026 3:44 PM IST
Sr Adv: kindly record that adjournment is sought by them
Court: on the ground that ED has filed an SLP before the SC, the matter is adjourned. Liberty to mention after the SC matter is disposed of.
14 Jan 2026 3:44 PM IST
Court: since he is asking for an adjournment, let me adjourn it
Sr Adv: since hearing has commenced, I am suggesting
ASG: court has said matter is adjourned how can you argue. Trinamool Congress is not a party in the second matter
14 Jan 2026 3:44 PM IST
Court: I am adjourning the second matter
ASG: i am thankful for a patient hearing
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: I am appearing I’m behalf of the chairperson of the AITC Mamata Banerjee
14 Jan 2026 3:40 PM IST
Court: Panchnamas demonstrate that nothing was seized from either the office of IPAC or its director.
In view of such submissions, nothing remains to be dealt with and the matter is disposed of.
ASG: it may be recorded that Mamata Banerjee seized everything
14 Jan 2026 3:38 PM IST
Court: respondents submit that nothing was seized from the premises on the searches made on 8th January.
ASG: whatever was seized was seized by Mamata Banerjee
14 Jan 2026 3:38 PM IST
Court dictating order.
Court: Only prayer of the petitioner is for preservation of political confidential data and protection of the same from being divulged.
14 Jan 2026 3:37 PM IST
ASG: I have stated that nothing was seized, and thus their plea may be disposed of. Nothing has been seized. Whatever was taken was taken away by Mamata Banerjee.
Court: Panchnama also says that nothing was seized
14 Jan 2026 3:35 PM IST
Guruswamy: I never said it will be withdrawn…you are having momentary amnesia
Raju: then it may be disposed of…I have no objection
14 Jan 2026 3:34 PM IST
ASG: the petitioners have stated that based on my statement their matter be withdrawn
Guruswamy: please record that he said nothing was seized and dispose it off
Mr Raju doesn’t know the difference between seized and disposed of
14 Jan 2026 3:33 PM IST
Guruswamy: the fear is the our political consultants office was attacked just a few months before the state election.
The next time you want to refer to a CM by name, give her the respect of calling her a CM.
Maintain decorum Mr Raju.

>Load More

ED Plea In Calcutta High Court Against Mamata Banerjee : Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Live Updates

Sr Adv: kindly record that adjournment is sought by them Court: on the ground that ED has filed an SLP before the SC, the matter is adjourned. Liberty to mention after the SC matter is disposed of.

Court: since he is asking for an adjournment, let me adjourn it Sr Adv: since hearing has commenced, I am suggesting ASG: court has said matter is adjourned how can you argue. Trinamool Congress is not a party in the second matter

Court: I am adjourning the second matter ASG: i am thankful for a patient hearing Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: I am appearing I’m behalf of the chairperson of the AITC Mamata Banerjee

Court: Panchnamas demonstrate that nothing was seized from either the office of IPAC or its director. In view of such submissions, nothing remains to be dealt with and the matter is disposed of. ASG: it may be recorded that Mamata Banerjee seized everything

Court: respondents submit that nothing was seized from the premises on the searches made on 8th January. ASG: whatever was seized was seized by Mamata Banerjee

Court dictating order. Court: Only prayer of the petitioner is for preservation of political confidential data and protection of the same from being divulged.

ASG: I have stated that nothing was seized, and thus their plea may be disposed of. Nothing has been seized. Whatever was taken was taken away by Mamata Banerjee. Court: Panchnama also says that nothing was seized

Guruswamy: I never said it will be withdrawn…you are having momentary amnesia Raju: then it may be disposed of…I have no objection

ASG: the petitioners have stated that based on my statement their matter be withdrawn Guruswamy: please record that he said nothing was seized and dispose it off Mr Raju doesn’t know the difference between seized and disposed of

Guruswamy: the fear is the our political consultants office was attacked just a few months before the state election. The next time you want to refer to a CM by name, give her the respect of calling her a CM. Maintain decorum Mr Raju.

Sr Adv: kindly record that adjournment is sought by them
Court: on the ground that ED has filed an SLP before the SC, the matter is adjourned. Liberty to mention after the SC matter is disposed of.

Court: since he is asking for an adjournment, let me adjourn it
Sr Adv: since hearing has commenced, I am suggesting
ASG: court has said matter is adjourned how can you argue. Trinamool Congress is not a party in the second matter

Court: I am adjourning the second matter
ASG: i am thankful for a patient hearing
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: I am appearing I’m behalf of the chairperson of the AITC Mamata Banerjee

Court: Panchnamas demonstrate that nothing was seized from either the office of IPAC or its director.
In view of such submissions, nothing remains to be dealt with and the matter is disposed of.
ASG: it may be recorded that Mamata Banerjee seized everything

Court: respondents submit that nothing was seized from the premises on the searches made on 8th January.
ASG: whatever was seized was seized by Mamata Banerjee

Court dictating order.
Court: Only prayer of the petitioner is for preservation of political confidential data and protection of the same from being divulged.

ASG: I have stated that nothing was seized, and thus their plea may be disposed of. Nothing has been seized. Whatever was taken was taken away by Mamata Banerjee.
Court: Panchnama also says that nothing was seized

Guruswamy: I never said it will be withdrawn…you are having momentary amnesia
Raju: then it may be disposed of…I have no objection

ASG: the petitioners have stated that based on my statement their matter be withdrawn
Guruswamy: please record that he said nothing was seized and dispose it off
Mr Raju doesn’t know the difference between seized and disposed of

Guruswamy: the fear is the our political consultants office was attacked just a few months before the state election.
The next time you want to refer to a CM by name, give her the respect of calling her a CM.
Maintain decorum Mr Raju.