'Industry' Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
18 March 2026 10:44 AM IST
![Industry Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2] Industry Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2026/03/17/750x450_662087-definition-of-industry-sc-live-updates.webp)
The Supreme Court constitution bench will continue its hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa.
This is the second day of the hearing.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Dipankar Datta, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Vipul Pancholi is hearing the matter.
Follow this page for the live updates. Report of first day's hearing can be read here.
Live Updates
- 18 March 2026 2:48 PM IST
Jaising- if they are, we have no problem. This court has upheld the constitutional validity of the administrative tribunal's act. Now, every state has an administrative tribunal of its own. We can go for relief from unfair dismissal and protection of 311 goes beyond by ID. So we are not stupid people that if we are covered by A. 311, we will clamour for coverage under ID Act
- 18 March 2026 2:48 PM IST
Jaising- there are certain rules and regulations and constitutional provisions that governs employees. one of the most fundamental articles in the Constitution is Article 311. If we are covering by Article 311 or 309, we would not be asking for us to be covered under the ID Act.
this is a reply to Naphade's argument that no department of the gov should be covered-he must answer are they covered by Article 309 or 311?
- 18 March 2026 2:47 PM IST
Jaising- at best, it can give you damages. Now, it was cleared by the ID Act, 1947. Because under this, the relief of reinstatement can be granted and when S. 11A was introduced in 1971. J Datta hinted at what is the jurisdiction of labour court and civil court, the former can decide de novo exercise its jurisdiction and decide whether the dismissal is unfair and unjustified and whether punishment is proportionate or not, which is something no civil court can do.
- 18 March 2026 2:47 PM IST
Jaising- there is no case made out for revisiting.
what do I mean by beneficial? The ID Act 1947 is a pre-constitution act. It gave to the workmen security of tenure which ordinary civil court can't give. the ordinary civil court is bound by the law of masters and servant under the common law. And it has no jurisdiction to grant reinstatement.
