'Industry' Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

18 March 2026 10:44 AM IST

  • Industry Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court constitution bench will continue its hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa.

    This is the second day of the hearing.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Dipankar Datta, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Vipul Pancholi is hearing the matter.

    Follow this page for the live updates. Report of first day's hearing can be read here.

    Live Updates

    • 18 March 2026 2:45 PM IST

      Jaising: i have indicated 3 reasons why according to me it strikes a note of caution in relation to answering the reference.

      it was suggested one problem was that CJ beg was to retire. But my submission is that amongst the separate judgments that was rendered, the most precise and concise articulation of the definition of industry was J Beg's.

    • 18 March 2026 1:14 PM IST

      to be continued post lunch

    • 18 March 2026 1:14 PM IST

      J Bagchi: we would be careful in adding a caveat that our interpretation is in reference to the repealed law and not in reference to 2020 code

    • 18 March 2026 1:09 PM IST

      J Bagchi: madam please consider this that this ratio in bangalore was anticipating a parliamentary act. because in all probability, Justice Iyer's was a stopgap definition, awaiting legislative response and it response has come after 50 years.

    • 18 March 2026 1:07 PM IST

      CJI: we are confined to interpretation of what the definition is

      Jaising: by what methodology of law? because you will have to decide whether exclusion of charity is right or wrong

    • 18 March 2026 1:07 PM IST

      CJI: we are not looking at the new act because then it would mean we are commenting on it

      Jaising: but i fail to understand how this reference can be answered without describing whether charity is covered by the definition of industry. if the 9 judge bench gives a decision that its not, you are uploading the 2020 code

    • 18 March 2026 1:05 PM IST

      Jaising: the problem for us comes in the exclusions. very carefully deconstruct this charitable and social-I am not aware of any legal definition of the word social. I only see that work under the CSR-corporate social responsibility, and then comes philanthropic and then sovereign functions

    • 18 March 2026 12:59 PM IST

      J Datta: how did it reach seven judges? Safargung was holding the field, how did it reach the seven judges?

      Jaising: it can by way of an appeal, my learned friend says it a reference order

    • 18 March 2026 12:58 PM IST

      CJI: if you go to 60s and 50s, there used to be four and six judge benches

      Sr Adv CU Singh: I have a judgment, i dont have it at hand but it explained why the 4 judges was only an administrative convenience

    • 18 March 2026 12:56 PM IST

      Jaising: may be in those days there were not enough judges and the CJ found it convinent to appoint a bench of six judges. ordinarily the court takes a precaution for anticipating a difference of opinion where the majority

    Next Story