'Jana Nayagan' Movie Case : Live Updates From Madras High Court Hearing | CBFC Appeal against Vijay's Film

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

20 Jan 2026 11:19 AM IST

  • Jana Nayagan Movie Case : Live Updates From Madras High Court Hearing | CBFC Appeal against Vijays Film
    Listen to this Article

    The Madras High Court will continue hearing today an appeal filed by the CBFC challenging a single judge's order asking it to give U/A certificate for the 'JanaNayagan' movie starring Tamil actor-politician Vijay.

    The bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G Arul Murugan will hear the appeal. On January 9th, a single judge had directed the CBFC to forthwith certify the movie. However, the division bench stayed the single bench's order the same day evening.

    Though this order was challenged in the Supreme Court by producer KVN Production, the Court refused to interfere, noting that the High Court was scheduled to hear the matter on January 20.

    Follow this page for live updates from the hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:50 PM IST

      Parasaran informs the court that on 31/12, Amazon had informed the producers that they would sue if there was no clarity regarding the date of release. Adds that producers have invested a lot of money.

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:46 PM IST

      Parasaran: Every scene that he wanted deleted having been deleted already..what is there?

      CJ: Is this on fact?

      Parasaran: All this is on facts. It has not been disputed

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:44 PM IST

      Parasaran: What joy do they have in killing the same scenes? They want me to re-introduce deleted scenes so that it can be again decided by another committee

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:42 PM IST

      Parasaran says that the complaint sought for deletion of scenes which were deleted.

      Parasaran: They want us to re-introduce the scenes that were deleted, submit the movie as it was before and then delete the same scenes. It's an empty exercise 

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:40 PM IST

      Parasaran: It would be an absurdity to interpret it in any manner other than what the single judge has done.

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:37 PM IST

      The judges are discussing among themselves

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:31 PM IST

      Parasaran says the writ court had rightly noted that revision can be done only either suo moto or by the applicant. Says when the complaint was made in a sealed cover, the applicant could not have responded

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:28 PM IST

      Parasaran: We only have the communication from the regional officer.

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:26 PM IST

      ASG: The communication is from the CBFC chairperson Prasoon Joshi to the regional officer Balamurugan

      CJ: Where is this letter? The matter has traveled from the writ court to the appeal court but no one has seen this document 

    • 20 Jan 2026 3:24 PM IST

      CJ: Show us where is the decision by the chairman. Because as per the statute, that is the decision of the board.

      ASG: That will not be here your honour. It will be uploaded in the e-cinepraman and a copy of it was given to the single judge. 

    Next Story