Sankaranarayanan: Before you issue this notice to me, you need to show that you satisfied yourself.

He refers to Section 126 of bnss.

Sankaranarayanan: Ex facie, as a recipient of notice like this, i ask myself, how do i respond to this? What is the substance on the basis of which you arrive at the conclusion?

Sankaranarayanan: It is mechanical, cut paste. Even for an interim bond, an enquiry is essential before you invite my response on interim bond. There has to be a preliminary enquiry by magistrate.

Court: Purport of show cause notice is satisfy me that during enquiry why you should not give the bond.

Sankaranarayanan: This notice does not meet with essential requirements as mandated by law under sec 136.

Sankaranarayanan: This question of personal bond cannot arise at this stage until an enquiry is conducted.

Sankaranarayanan: This stage has not reached yet (to execute personal bond).

Court: This stage we will reach when enquiry begins. We are right now at pre 135.

Sankaranarayanan: Order is in two parts. Not one is dealing with satisfaction.

Sankaranarayanan: Judgment after judgment, it has been held that in show cause notice situation, courts have frowned upon by cut paste of the provision.

Sankaranarayanan: Question is does this have substance?

We don’t need permission to hoist national flag.

Sankaranarayanan: The magistrate here is an ACP. On this kalandra, small order is passed on same day.

Sankaranarayanan: There is no 163 there. But loudspeakers are telling us that 163 is there.