Supreme Court Allows NEET Counselling For PG & UG Admissions For 2021-2022 Based On Existing EWS/OBC Reservation In All India Quota

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the commencement of counselling process for NEET-PG and NEET-UG for 2021-22 admissions on the basis of the existing 27% quota for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections(EWS) in the All India Quota.The Court upheld the constitutionality of 27% OBC reservation. As regards criteria to determine EWS(Rupees 8 lakhs gross annual income cut-off), the Court allowed the existing criteria to operate for the current admission year so as to not delay the admission process further. However, future application of EWS criteria, which has been stipulated in the Office Memorandum of July 2019, will be subject to final outcome of the petitions.A bench comprising Justice DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna, which had reserved orders yesterday, pronounced the verdict today morning.The Court passed an interim order with the following directions :1. We accept the recommendations of the Pandey committee that the criteria which has been stipulated in OM 2019(for EWS) be used for 2021–20 22 in order to ensure that the admission process is not dislocated2. Counselling on the basis of NEET PG 2021 and NEET UG 2021 shall be conducted by giving effect to the resolution as provided by the notice dated 29 July 2021 including the 27% reservation for OBC category and 10% reservation for EWS category in the All India Quota seats3. The criteria for determination of the EWS notified by OM 2019 shall be used for identifying the EWS category who appeared for Neet UG and Neet PG 2021 examinations4. The validity of the criteria determined by the Pandey committee for identifying the EWS prospectively for the future be subject to the final results of the petitions5. The petition shall be listed for final hearing on the validity of the EWS criteria as recommended by the Pandey committee in the third week of March 2022. The bench had extensive arguments made by Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, Arvind P Datar, P Wilson, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General of India KM Nataraj and few intervenors in the case for two days.Summary of argumentsSenior Advocate Shyam Divan argued that introducing OBC/EWS reservations in July after the issuance of exam notification amounted to changing the rules of the game midway. His arguments were mainly two-fold - that the introduction of OBC/EWS quota amounted to changing the rules of the game in the middle; that the quota could not have been introduced through an executive instruction as the AIQ was carved out by the Court.He also argued that postgraduate admissions must be completely merit-based and reservations must be minimal. He referred to Supreme Court judgments which hold that there should be no reservation in super-speciality courses."In many courses, postgraduate is the end of the road, and that is the super-speciality in some departments. So the principle regarding super-speciality courses will apply to postgraduate courses too", he submitted.Senior Advocate Arvind Datar argued that the Rupees 8 lakh cut-off for EWS is "over-inclusive" and "arbitrary" and was adopted without conducting any proper study. According to him, applying this criterion uniformly across the country is unreasonable, in view of regional income disparities. He urged that the Court should direct the Centre to adopt the criteria of Rs 2.5 lakhs (up to which there is no income tax liability), if at all EWS is to be implemented. Rebutting these arguments, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta asserted that the EWS criteria was arrived at after conducting extensive deliberations. He highlighted that the exercise is not to identify the "poor" category but the "economically weaker sections". So, it has to be distinguished from BPL category. The top law officer of the Union Government submitted that not allowing reservation in All India Quota would amount to discrimination. The Solicitor General had made submissions, requesting the Court to allow the commencement of NEET-PG Counselling."Let us proceed with the counselling. Let that stage be over. Your lordships may start hearing the matter in the meanwhile and we can assist the court in great detail. We need doctors and their concerns are genuine. As a society, we cannot go into lengthy arguments now. We said we will revisit and the report has been submitted now", the Solicitor General submitted.Senior Advocate P Wilson, appearing for the DMK party, made arguments in support of OBC reservation in All India Quota. Background The case relates to the challenge against the validity of the Centre's decision to introduce OBC/EWS reservation in the All India Quota of NEET admissions. The dispute has its origin in the notification issued by the Central Government on July 29, which introduced 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes(OBCs) and 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections(EWS) in the All India Quota(AIQ) for undergraduate and postgraduate medical /...

Supreme Court Allows NEET Counselling For PG & UG Admissions For 2021-2022 Based On Existing EWS/OBC Reservation In All India Quota

Shruti Kakkar & Mehal Jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Shruti Kakkar & Mehal Jain

Supreme Court Allows NEET Counselling For PG & UG Admissions For 2021-2022 Based On Existing EWS/OBC Reservation In All India Quota

Shruti Kakkar & Mehal Jain

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Shruti Kakkar & Mehal Jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers