Supreme Court Asks Bar Council Of India To Suspend Licenses Of Advocates In Odisha For Court Boycott & Act Against Office Bearers Of Bar Associations

The Supreme Court on Monday said that it expected the the Bar Council of India to suspend the licenses of the lawyers who have been striking in Odisha over a long-standing demand for a permanent bench of the Orissa High Court in the western part of the state, at Sambalpur. The Bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S. Oka, also recommended that the Bar Council take "appropriate action" against the district bar associations whose members have been involved in the protests. To the recalcitrant lawyers, Justice Kaul issued a grim injunction, saying, "We will make sure you face all the consequences till you resume work. Hundred per cent of work has to be resumed, there is no other option." Similarly, lambasting the bar associations, Justice Kaul said, "We had already cautioned the associations on many occasions that if they failed to conduct themselves as a member of the noble profession, they lose any protection. They have done everything to invite what we are now directing to uphold the majesty of law and make the working of the court functional. If the leaders of the bar associations in Odisha seek to invite our action, we will have to oblige them."Earlier, on November 14, the Bench had issued a thinly veiled warning to the agitating lawyers that their registrations would be cancelled, and contempt proceedings initiated against them if they failed to "conduct themselves" and desist from such acts that had "practically brought the working of the judicial system to a standstill and jeopardised the litigating public". The district bar associations had also been directed to ensure that their members "fell in line". The Bench had said, "Access to justice is the very foundation of a legal system. The legal fraternity is the instrument of access to justice to the people at large. When the very instruments abstain from court proceedings, the casualty is the access to justice to the common people and it is the common people and litigants who suffer. We will not countenance this." On Monday, the apex court noted with profound disappointment that despite its stern directives, agitations and picketing continued in the state, disrupting the working of the court. Several bar associations in the state of Odisha continued to abstain from work, Justice Kaul's bench was informed. Justice Kaul observed that the judicial work, in at least 20 districts, continued to be hampered in the month of October. "3,216 cumulative judicial working hours have been lost," he said with dismay.The protesting lawyers also reportedly obstructed the ingress and egress of litigants, judicial officers, and other lawyers into the court building of the district court in Khordha on Friday. Consequently, the district judge wrote to the apex court seeking protection for the judicial officers, staff, and litigants. Taking note of these developments, the Bench said. "They were obstructed by 300-400 advocates. But, even after the police personnel reached, the bar members prevented access by violently obstructing them. No prior intimation was given to the district judge by the bar association members regarding such picketing". Such picketing was staged by the members of many bar associations across the state, including Sambalpur and Badamba. The lawyer are reportedly agitating for setting up regional benches of the High Court.The Bench, relying on the supplementary affidavit filed by the Orissa High Court, also observed, "From the conduct of the advocates, there is little doubt that there are many so-called advocates enrolled at the bar, whose bread and butter is obviously not this profession."Justice Kaul, speaking for the Bench, dictated the order as follows: "We would expect the Bar Council of India to take appropriate action against all the members of the bar associations. Logically, we would expect their licenses to be suspended, at least till the work is resumed. Further action must be taken against the members of the action committee as well. We expect the police to provide full-proof arrangements for the ingress and egress of not only judicial officers but also all willing members of the bar and the public, who would be entitled to contest their own proceedings". The Bench also directed the administration to take "appropriate steps, including preventive arrest or otherwise as required in the wisdom of the administrative" to ensure willing members of the bar, the judicial officers, and the public access to the court buildings. However, Justice Kaul acknowledged that the apex court could only emphasise that it was the "duty and obligation" of the administration to make the courts functional, and the task to design a "suitable methodology" ultimately fell on the administration itself. Further, the Bench directed the judicial officers in the courts hit by the protests to pass necessary orders in all proceedings. "If adverse orders become necessary, let the same be passed as we have given the option to the litigants to come to court and...

Supreme Court Asks Bar Council Of India To Suspend Licenses Of Advocates In Odisha For Court Boycott & Act Against Office Bearers Of Bar Associations

Awstika Das

"100% Work Has to Resume, No Other Option," SC Urges BCI to Suspend the Licenses Agitating Lawyers in Odisha and Take Action Against District Bar Associations

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Awstika Das

Supreme Court Asks Bar Council Of India To Suspend Licenses Of Advocates In Odisha For Court Boycott & Act Against Office Bearers Of Bar Associations

Awstika Das

"100% Work Has to Resume, No Other Option," SC Urges BCI to Suspend the Licenses Agitating Lawyers in Odisha and Take Action Against District Bar Associations

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Awstika Das

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers