Supreme Court Asks Yamuna River Board To Decide Delhi Govt's Plea For Additional Water; HP Govt Withdraws Statement On Surplus Water

The Supreme Court (today on June 13), disposed of the Delhi Government's plea seeking directions to the State of Haryana for immediate release of water to the crisis-hit national capital. While doing so, the Court directed the Delhi Government to approach the Upper Yamuna River Board (UYRB), saying that the issue concerning the sharing of the Yamuna water between States is a complex and sensitive issue. A Vacation Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Prasanna B Varale added that the Court does not have the expertise to deal with the issue of water sharing.“The issue should be left to be considered by the body constituted with the agreement of parties in MOU dated 1994. Since the Upper Yamuna River Board (UYRB) has already directed Delhi to submit an application for the supply of additional 150 cusecs of water on humanitarian grounds, such an application be made, if not already made, by today by 5 pm, and thereafter the UYRB shall convene a meeting tomorrow and take decision in the matter at the earliest. If need be, the board can convene the basis on day to day basis. The Writ petition is disposed off.,” the Court ordered. The Court also noted that this issue has become a part of recurring litigation. In today's order, it was also noted that a similar application was filed before the Court in 2018, and subsequently, a committee was appointed. Then also, the Court refused to issue any direction to the State of Haryana. In this context, the Court also recorded the submissions of Additional Solicitor General Vikramjeet Banerjee, for the Board. He submitted that the issue can be resolved by the board and not by the Apex Court, which does not have the necessary expertise in the matter. Similarly, the State of HP also submitted that that issue can be resolved by the parties.Withdrawal Of Statement By The State Of Himachal Pradesh About The Availability Of Surplus Water Pertinently, on June 06, the Court, taking note of the stand of the Himachal Pradesh Government that they have additional water, had directed them to transfer 137 cusecs of water to the Hathnikund barrage in Haryana and asked the Haryana Government to facilitate the transfer of the surplus water received from HP to Delhi. However, yesterday, the Court pointed out that the letter filed by the Himachal which suggested that it had no surplus water left as it had already been released. Warning the State of Contempt, Court said “The officer who has supplied that chart is saying that we have excess water of 137 cusecs and the additional AG was not properly apprised of the situation. Now, you are issuing a letter that 137 is already in the pipeline….If you have excess water and you are not supplying that excess water, you are in contempt. ” During the course of today's hearing, HP's Advocate General, who was present virtually before the Court, tried to give clarification. He told the Court that the officer was present (virtually) and apologised. He averred that the intent was not made clear. However, the Court rebutted the same, saying that it is a serious and sensitive problem. “You do not understand the repercussion of your statement to cover up the earlier statement….made such a casual statement before the Court without understanding the ramifications.” The Court, without mincing any words, said that had this not been such an emergent matter, it would have kept this pending to haul the State up for contempt. In this context, the Court recorded the following, in its order: “…when the State of Haryana requested the state of HP to inform them about the release of additional 137 cusecs water, as per the Court's order, the Jal Shakti Vibhag informed....via its letter dated June 6th that 137 cusecs unutilised water is already flowing...in river Yamuna. In course of hearing today when we confronted…Ld. AG would submit that the earlier statement made regarding the availability of surplus/ additional water was not correct, and he may be permitted to withdraw that statement. He would submit that in view of what is mentioned in the communication dated June 6th, the State of HP is not available with additional 136 cusecs of water. In view of the statement made by AG of HP, the very basis of our interim order of June 6th, 2024 does not survive, and we have reached square one to the stage where we were pleased on the date of filing the Writ Petition.” Apart from this, yesterday, the Bench raised serious concerns regarding the loss of water in Delhi due to several factors like the Tanker mafia. While asking the Delhi Government if any action has been taken against the same, it also categorically said that, in case of inaction, the matter will be handed over to the Delhi Police. Accordingly, the Court ordered the Delhi Government to file an affidavit against the action taken for the illegal transportation of water and adjourned the matter to today. Senior Advocate AM Singhvi,...

Supreme Court Asks Yamuna River Board To Decide Delhi Govt's Plea For Additional Water; HP Govt Withdraws Statement On Surplus Water

Gyanvi Khanna

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Gyanvi Khanna

Supreme Court Asks Yamuna River Board To Decide Delhi Govt's Plea For Additional Water; HP Govt Withdraws Statement On Surplus Water

Gyanvi Khanna

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Gyanvi Khanna

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers