Supreme Court Deletes Direction On Supervision Of Kerala Waqf Board By Govt Official, Asks HC To Decide Plea Expeditiously

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 21) deleted Kerala High Court's direction that the State Waqf Board shall function under supervision of the government's Joint Secretary/Additional Secretary of government.The court passed the order in the Board's plea challenging the Kerala High Court's order restraining it from taking major policy decisions over absence of 2 non-Muslim members. The Apex Court meanwhile asked the High Court to expeditiously decide the case.A bench of CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul Pancholi ordered,"In view of the opening line of para 6, where under Board has been directed to not undertake any capital expenditure etc. without leave of the court, we are satisfied that there is no necessity for retention of last line of para 6 of the order. Consequently, the direction that the Board shall function under supervision of jt. secy/Additional Secretary of government is hereby deleted. The Joint secretary/Additional Secretary being a member of Board should continue to function in that capacity. Matter coming up before HC tomorrow. We decide HC to decide expeditiously after giving a fair opportunity to parties to file claims/counter-claims".During the hearing, senior advocate Jaideep Gupta appearing for the State of Kerala submitted that the high court's order was interim in nature and did not require interference by Supreme Court at this stage. The court however orally asked as to why should the Board for this reason stand handicapped by the restriction. Meanwhile, senior counsel V Chidambaresh appearing for the Waqf Board said that the ad-interim order was passed behind the back of the Board.To this the CJI orally said, "We are only concerned with para 6 (restraining policy decisions without leave of Court)". At this stage senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi also appearing for the Waqf Board said that February 14 Notification originally appointed 9 members who have a term of 5 years. "What they want to do is - they want to substitute them with their own people. That's the game. PIL filed by someone who belongs to a political party. Where was the question of saying that Board can't function? And natural justice? I appear before court and say give me time...members of Waqf Board are not served with copy...extraordinary order passed. Section 14 (of the United Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995) does not say that if there is any vacancy, then Board becomes defunct," Ahmadi said. Ahmadi said that the only ground raised in the High Court order is non-appointment of Non-Muslim members. Meanwhile Justice Bagchi orally said, "This is an ad-interim order. Question of your prejudice can be taken care of by seeking modification of that order. And we can give that liberty. The extent to which it becomes egregious interference in day-to-day functioning...we will set aside last line". Chidambaresh said that the board cannot be under the command of government officers and urged that the entire paragraph on this aspect should go. Ahmadi meanwhile said that the court may delete last line and at the highest, 2 Non-Muslim members could be appointed. CJI however said that the matter was coming up tomorrow in the high court and it will ask the court to decide the case expeditiously. On July 17, the matter was mentioned for urgent listing by Senior Advocate V Chitambaresh, saying that through an interim order without notice to the other side, the Board had been made virtually defunct. The senior counsel pointed out that in a similar order concerning the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, the Supreme Court had granted interim relief.To recap, the High Court passed the restraint order after noting that the State Wakf Board was constituted without including two non-Muslim members and one Shia member as per the mandatory requirements introduced as per the 2025 Waqf Amendment Act.Acting on PILs filed challenging the State Wakf Board constitution, the High Court Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. prima facie found that the Board is not constituted in accordance with Section 14 of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act 1995 due to the absence of 2 non-Muslim members and one Shia member."In view of the fact that admittedly, two non-Muslim members have not been included in the Waqf Board and also, as urged by some of the writ petitioners that one Shia member should also be included, we hold that the constitution of the Board prima facie appears to be not in conformity with Section14 of the said Act. Hence, the present Board shall not take any major decisions or incur any capital expenditure or any policy decision without the express leave of this Court," the High Court ordered.Board's arguments in the Special Leave PetitionThe Board's central submission is that the High Court ignored Section 22 of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995, which expressly provides that vacancies or ...

Supreme Court Deletes Direction On Supervision Of Kerala Waqf Board By Govt Official, Asks HC To Decide Plea Expeditiously

Debby Jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Debby Jain

Supreme Court Deletes Direction On Supervision Of Kerala Waqf Board By Govt Official, Asks HC To Decide Plea Expeditiously

Debby Jain

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Debby Jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers