Following Justice CT Ravikumar's Retirement, Supreme Court Bench Hearing Pleas Seeking Review Of PMLA Verdict To Be Reconstituted

Following the retirement of Justice CT Ravikumar of Supreme Court, the bench hearing review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgement, which upheld various provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), is set to be reconstituted.It may be recalled that the matter was being considered by a bench of Justices Surya Kant, CT Ravikumar and Ujjal Bhuyan, but got adjourned on multiple occasions between August-November, 2024 without any effective hearing. It was last listed on November 27, when no next date of hearing was fixed.Notably, the Court is seized of another case (Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited) where the petitioners seek reconsideration of the VMC judgment. In November, 2023, the 3-judge bench dealing with the matter - comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna (now CJI), and Bela M Trivedi - came to be dissolved following Justice Kaul's retirement. Subsequently, Justice MM Sundresh replaced Justice Kaul on the bench and the matter is still pending.BackgroundThe VMC judgment was delivered on July 27, 2022 by a bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar. Vide this judgment, certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) were upheld. These included -(i) Sections 5, 8(4), 15, 17 and 19 of PMLA, relating to Enforcement Directorate's power of arrest, attachment, search and seizure;(ii) Section 24 of PMLA, relating to reverse burden of proof (in this regard, the Court said the provision had "reasonable nexus" with the objects of the Act);(iii) Section 45 of PMLA, which provides "twin-conditions" for bail (in this regard, it was said that the Parliament was competent to amend the provision in 2018 even after the Supreme Court's judgment in Nikesh Tarachand Shah, which struck down the conditions).Subsequent to this decision, the instant review petitions (8 in number) were filed. With the retirement of Justice AM Khanwilkar, then CJI NV Ramana presided over the bench to consider the petitions.While issuing notice on August 25, 2022, CJI Ramana-led bench orally observed that at least two conclusions of the judgment required relook - first, that the copy of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR; equivalent of FIR in money laundering cases) need not be given to the accused, and second, the upholding of the reversal of presumption of innocence.Thereafter, the Court allowed an application for open court hearing of the review petitions. Since issuance of notice, the petitions were listed for hearing for the first time on August 7. On this date, the matter had to be adjourned at request of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who sought some time to prepare and argue. Subsequently, pursuant to a mentioning, the matter was listed on September 18 but got re-listed for October 16. On the said date, it could not be taken up as Justice Kant was on leave.Case Title : Karti P Chidambaram v. The Directorate of Enforcement | RP(Crl) 219/2022 (and connected cases)

Following Justice CT Ravikumar's Retirement, Supreme Court Bench Hearing Pleas Seeking Review Of PMLA Verdict To Be Reconstituted

Debby Jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Following Justice CT Ravikumar's Retirement, Supreme Court Bench Hearing Pleas Seeking Review Of PMLA Verdict To Be Reconstituted

Debby Jain

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers