Supreme Court Stays Reinstatement Of IAS Officer Who Emptied Delhi Stadium To Walk Her Dog

Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

10 Sept 2026 8:32 PM IST

  • Supreme Court Stays Reinstatement Of IAS Officer Who Emptied Delhi Stadium To Walk Her Dog
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court recently stayed the reinstatement of an IAS officer, Rinku Dhugga, who was given compulsory retirement by the Government following a controversy that she and her husband, also an IAS officer, emptied the Delhi Thyagaraj Stadium so that she could walk her dog.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana issued notice to the respondent officer on the plea by the Union Government challenging the Delhi High Court which set aside her compulsory retirement. It also passed an interim order, which says: "In the meantime, the reinstatement of the respondent shall remain stayed."

    Dhugga had challenged the compulsory retirement before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which ordered her reinstatement. This was upheld by the Delhi High Court on April 15.

    The High Court considered that apart from the controversy regarding her dog for which she was awarded a minor punishment in the disciplinary proceedings, there was also an allegation of authorised absence. Both were the reasons why she was awarded compulsory retirement. However, it found that the decision couldn't be sustained as the Review Committee, which recommended the retirement, didn't consider all factors such as the fact that the officer was not awarded any adverse remarks in her APARs, her grading in the preceding years was outstanding, and that she was being considered for promotion.

    It held that the decision of compulsory retirement is to weed out the deadwood, which was inapplicable to her case.

    Against this, the Union Government came in appeal.

    The matter will now be heard on October 13.

    Case Details: Union of India v RINKU DHUGGA| SLP (c) No. 25799/2026

    Click Here To Read Order

    For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.; Ms. Gargie Boss, Adv.; Ms. Mitali Karwa, Adv.; Ms. Radhika Mishra, Adv.; Ms. Prerna Dhal, Adv.; Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.; Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv.; Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR; and Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR.

    For the Respondent(s): Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Nikunj Arora, Adv.; Mr. Ashish Pandey, AOR; and Mr. Parth Johri, Adv.


    Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

    Gursimran Kaur Bakshi

    Gursimran is the Principal Correspondent with LiveLaw for the Supreme Court. She can be reached out at: simrankaurbakshi@livelaw.in

    Next Story