Gun License Can't Be Cancelled Without Proving Rule 32 Violation Under Arms Rules, 2016: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that as per Rule 32 of the Arms Rules 2016, it is essential that the adjudicating authority decides whether a violation of the relevant rules took place, prior to cancelling a firearm license.“From the reading of Rule 32, it is clear that before a licence can be cancelled under Rule 32, it is necessary that the authority forms an opinion as to whether...

Consumer Law Monthly Digest: November 2025

Supreme Court Company Purchasing Software To Enhance Efficiency & Profit Is Not A “Consumer” Within Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court Cause Title: M/S POLY MEDICURE LTD. VERSUS M/S BRILLIO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 1102 The Supreme Court on Thursday (November 13) ruled that a person purchasing a product for a 'commercial purpose' having...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Challenging WeWork India IPO, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost On Petitioner

The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed two petitions challenging the IPO of WeWork India, bringing an end to an attempt by two retail investors to stop or modify the company's public issue over allegations of inadequate disclosures.A division bench of Justice R I Chagla and Justice Farhan A Dubash dismissed the petition filed by an invetsor Hemant Kulshreshtha with no order as to costs,...

Delhi High Court Deletes Bail Condition On Accused To Share 24x7 Location Through Google With Police

The Delhi High Court has deleted a bail condition imposed on an accused mandating him to share his location 24 x 7 through Google with the Investigating Officer. Justice Vikas Mahajan relied on the ruling of the Supreme Court in Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau wherein it was held that court cannot impose a condition on the accused to keep the police constantly informed about his...

Chandigarh Consumer Commission Orders WTC Developers To Refund ₹18.90 Lakh For Failure To Deliver Possession

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh, comprising Mr. Amrinder Singh Sidhu (President) and Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma (Member), has held WTC Chandigarh Development Co. Pvt. Ltd. and WTC Noida Development Co. Pvt. Ltd. liable for deficiency in service for failing to deliver possession of a commercial unit within the stipulated time despite...

Tamil Nadu SIR| Teachers Appointed As BLOs Shouldn't Face Coercive Action For Not Meeting Targets : TVK Party Tells Supreme Court

The Supreme Court will hear on December 4 the plea by the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Tamil Nadu.The bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing the matter. During the hearing, Sr Advocate Gopal Sankarnarayanan, appearing for the TVK Party, highlighted the mental health effects on the school...

Bombay High Court Delivers Split Verdict On Central Govt Power To Substitute Nominated Members Of Cantonment Board

The Bombay High Court recently delivered a split verdict on the issue of powers of the Central Government to substitute a nominated member of a Cantonment Board.A division bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Dr Neela Gokhale delivered divergent views on the issue pertaining to the removal of a member of Deolali Cantonment Board in Nashik, before the end of her tenure, which was to...

NCLT Orders Opulent Infradevelopers' Directors To Repay Rs 10.46 Crore For Fraudulent Transactions

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) at New Delhi has ordered suspended directors of insolvent Opulent Infradevelopers to personally contribute Rs 10.46 crore back to the company after finding that they ran the business “with intent to defraud creditors” by making unauthorised donations, advancing interest-free loans, falsifying accounts and booking fictitious expenses. The order...

Customary Court Can't Enlarge Strength Of Bench After Hearing Ends Or Back Date Its Orders: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that an Inter-Village Territorial Customary Court cannot enlarge its forum after the conclusion of hearing or retrospectively date a later decision without granting a fresh hearing.Justice Budi Habung presiding over the case, observed, “Such enlargement of the forum after conclusion of hearing and retrospective dating of a later decision without further...

Anchoring The Intangible: Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling On Cryptocurrency As Property And Trust

The judgment delivered by the Madras High Court in Rhutikumari v. Zanmai Labs Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. is a decisive step in India's journey towards legal clarity with respect to virtual digital assets. The dispute involved Rhutikumari, an investor in the WazirX cryptocurrency exchange platform run by Zanmai Labs, whose portfolio account held 3,532.30 XRP coins valued at approximately Rs. 9,55,148.20. The controversy emerged in the wake of a devastating cyberattack in July 2024, which caused the...

High Court Quashes Rioting FIR Against Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann, AAP Leaders Over 2020 Protest

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has quashed an FIR and all consequential proceedings against several Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders including Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann arising from a 2020 protest in Chandigarh during Congress government, holding that no prima facie case existed against them and that the alleged offences under the IPC were not made out.The Court quashed the FIR and...

Delhi Court Lets Izuk Impex Challenge Validity of Health-Care Firm's '5 STAR' Trademark

A Delhi District Court has allowed Izuk Impex, a herbal hair product manufacturer to challenge the validity of the “5 STAR” trademark owned by Five Star Health Care LLP, saying objection appears prima facie tenable. District Judge Pritam Singh of the Saket Courts passed the order on November 7, 2025, in a trademark infringement case filed by Izuk Impex. The company has accused Five...