Haryana RERA Dismisses Complaint Against Vatika Ltd After Complainant Fails To Show Proof Of Allotment

The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority recently dismissed a complaint seeking execution of a builder buyer agreement, allotment of a plot, possession and delayed possession charges for a Vatika project in Gurugram after holding that the complainant had not produced any evidence to show that a plot had ever been allotted.The matter was heard by a bench of Chairperson Arun Kumar, who...

Punjab RERA Orders Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Five-Year Delay In Possession

The Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority has recently directed Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers to pay statutory interest to a homebuyer for a delay of more than five years in handing over possession of a flat in its project 'The Lake'. A coram of Member Arunvir Vashista held that the delay violated Section 18(1) of the RERA Act and that the homebuyer was entitled to interest from...

LiveLawBiz: Business Law Daily Round-Up: December 02, 2025

TAX AssessmentOrder Passed Without Awaiting DVD Report Violates S. 50C(2) IncomeTax Act: ITAT Ahmedabad 'WritNot Maintainable In Face Of Disputed Ownership': Delhi High Court InCustoms Gold Confiscation Case S.153C Income Tax Act | Public Info, Unrelated Data Seized FromSearched Person Not Enough To Issue Show Cause Notice: Gujarat HighCourt IncomeTax Act | S. 153C Proceedings Unsustainable...

Bombay High Court To Examine If Non-Advertised Project Need Mandatory RERA Registration

The Bombay High Court has stayed a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order requiring a builder to register two additional wings of its real estate project in Maharashtra, noting that the central issue of whether registration under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act becomes mandatory when no units are advertised or offered for sale requires...

Chandigarh Consumer Commission Rejects Appeal For Higher Compensation In Ford Endeavour Repair Case

The Chandigarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Justice Raj Shekhar Attri (President) and Rajesh Kumar Arya (Member), has dismissed an appeal filed by M/s Green Force Engineers Pvt. Ltd. seeking enhancement of compensation for alleged faulty repair of a Ford Endeavour by M/s Bhagat Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Bhagat Ford). Brief Facts M/s Green Force Engineers Pvt....

RERA Authorities Cannot Decide Title Disputes Or Issue Declarations and Injunctions Like Civil Court : Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently held that authorities and tribunals under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) cannot adjudicate title disputes between allottees or grant declaratory and injunctive reliefs, ruling that such powers lie exclusively with civil courts. Clarifying the limits of RERA jurisdiction, the court held that disputes concerning the validity...

'Behind Every File Lies A Person': Consumer Commission Raps MEDISEP, Insurer For Wrongful Claim Repudiation, Orders Reimbursement

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam recently directed the insurance company and Medisep to jointly compensate a man whose claim for reimbursement of hospital expenses was repudiated.The Bench comprising D.B. Binu (President), V. Ramachandran and Sreevidhia T.N. was considering a complaint preferred by a man covered under the MEDISEP Health Insurance Scheme introduced...

Mumbai Consumer Commission Orders Niva Bupa To Pay ₹66.50 Lakh For Wrongfully Denying Cancer Treatment Claim

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai Suburban, comprising Smt. Samindara R. Surve (President) and Shri Sameer S. Kamble (Member), held Niva Bupa Health Insurance Ltd. liable for deficiency in service for wrongfully cancelling the complainant's policy and rejecting his overseas cancer treatment claim. The Commission found that the insurer's...

RERA Orders Not Decrees, Cannot Be Executed Through Civil Courts: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has recently ruled that an order passed by a Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) does not amount to a civil court decree and cannot be executed through civil execution proceedings, holding that RERA orders must be enforced only through the statutory recovery mechanism provided under the Act. A single bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna said the statutory scheme...

Consumer Law Monthly Digest: November 2025

Supreme Court Company Purchasing Software To Enhance Efficiency & Profit Is Not A “Consumer” Within Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court Cause Title: M/S POLY MEDICURE LTD. VERSUS M/S BRILLIO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 1102 The Supreme Court on Thursday (November 13) ruled that a person purchasing a product for a 'commercial purpose' having...

Chandigarh Consumer Commission Orders WTC Developers To Refund ₹18.90 Lakh For Failure To Deliver Possession

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh, comprising Mr. Amrinder Singh Sidhu (President) and Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma (Member), has held WTC Chandigarh Development Co. Pvt. Ltd. and WTC Noida Development Co. Pvt. Ltd. liable for deficiency in service for failing to deliver possession of a commercial unit within the stipulated time despite...

Renewal Application Within One Year Saves Insurance Claim Despite Expired Transport Licence, Holds Punjab Consumer Commission

The Chandigarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Justice Daya Chaudhary (President) and Vishav Kant Garg (Member), held that although the driver's transport licence had expired on the date of the accident, his application for renewal had been filed within the one-year statutory window under Section 15(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and therefore the lapse...