Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 10 To February 16, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 153 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 189NOMINAL INDEXRENUKA KULKARNI & ORS v. STATE and other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 153 SIR RATAN TATA TRUST & ANR v. DR. RAJAT SHRIVASTAVA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 154 Rocktek Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner Of Customs (Import) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 155 Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 156 Bharat Singh vs. Karan Singh & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 157 MOHD. RAFAYAT ALI v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 158 Sushil Aggarwal v. Principal Commissioner Of Customs and connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 159 M/S Addichem Speciallity LLP v. Special Commissioner I, Department Of Trade And Taxes And Anr and batch 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 160 ABHIJEET KUMAR v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 161 THILAKASRI KREPANAND & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 162 Jan Seva Welfare Society (Reg.) v. Union of India and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 163 AMAL SHARMA v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 164 HARMEET SINGH v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 165 Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited vs. Sammaan Capital Limited & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 166 Star India Pvt. Ltd vs. IPTV Smarter Pro & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 167 ROJALINI PARIDA v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 168 DR PRANNOY ROY & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 169 Anshul Gupta v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 170 KORE NIHAL PRAMOD v. UNION OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 171 JUSTICE (RETD.) S.N. DHINGRA, PRESIDENT, SAMAY YAAN (SASHAKT SAMAJ) v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 172 BHADRA INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD AND ORS. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 173 Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Ashar Nisar & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 174 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. PRASHANT JAIN 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 175 Oracle America, Inc. vs. Mr. Sandeep Khandelwal And Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 176 Rajbir Singh vs. Commissioner Mcd And Anr Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 177 SHOBHA VERMA AND ANR v. ASHOK KAPOOR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 178 Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. (IRCTC) vs. M/s. Brandavan Food Products 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 179 Aon Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (Successor Entity Of Aon Services (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1 And Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 180 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S Chemester Food Industries Pvt. Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 181 STATE v. NILESH MISHRA and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 182 RAKESH KUMAR v. CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AND ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 183 AJAY v. STATE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 184 VANEETA GUPTA & ANR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR2025 LiveLaw (Del) 185 Amit Kumar v. The Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 186 Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Benetton India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 187 Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Benetton India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 188 M/S Aims Retail Services Private Limited v. Union Of India & Ors. and batch 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 189Bald Allegations Against Investigating Officer Not Sufficient To Transfer Probe To Another Agency: Delhi High CourtTitle: RENUKA KULKARNI & ORS v. STATE and other connected matterCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 153The Delhi High Court has observed that transfer of investigation to another agency is only done in rare and exceptional cases where high officials of State authorities are involved.“Accusations against an investigating officer alone is not sufficient to transfer investigation unless there is sufficient material to show that the investigating officer is mixed up with the accused. Bald allegations are not sufficient for transfer of investigation,” Justice Subramonium Prasad said.Ratan Tata Is Well-Known Personal Name, Needs To Be Protected From Unauthorised Use By Third Party: Delhi High CourtTitle: SIR RATAN TATA TRUST & ANR v. DR. RAJAT SHRIVASTAVA & ORS.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 154The Delhi High Court has said that the name of industrialist Ratan Tata is a “well- known personal name or trademark” which needs to be protected from any unauthorised use by any third party.Justice Mini Pushkarna ruled in favour of Ratan Tata Trust in a suit filed against a journalist- Dr. Rajat Srivastava, alleging that the latter was unauthorisedly using Ratan Tata's name to host an award ceremony.Imposition Of Conditions By Customs For Provisional Release Of Seized Goods 'Discretionary': Delhi HC Tunes Down 130% Bank GuaranteeCase title: Rocktek Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner Of Customs (Import)Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 155The Delhi High Court has held that the imposition and severity of conditions imposed by the Customs Department for permitting provisional release of seized goods is “discretionary” in nature.In doing so, a division bench of Justices...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 10 To February 16, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 10 To February 16, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers