Gujarat High Court Annual Digest 2025 [Citations 1 - 240]

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 1 to 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 240Depriving An Employee Of Leave Encashment Which Is Akin To Salary And Is Thus A Property Violates His Constitutional Right: Gujarat HCCase title: Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v/s Sadgunbhai Semulbhai SolankiCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 1Dismissing Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's plea against a labour court order directing it to pay arrears of leave encashment to a retired employee, the Gujarat High Court underscored that depriving a person of leave encashment–which is akin to salary and is thus a property, violates his statutory rights in the Constitution of India.Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Against Mobile Games Alleged To Be Games Of Chance, In View Of Similar Pending Plea In Bombay HCCase title: Sumit Kapurbhai Prajapati vs Union of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 2Observing that an identical PIL is pending before the Bombay High Court raising the same issue, the Gujarat High Court on Friday (January 3) dismissed a plea seeking a restrain on the operation on certain mobile game platforms on the ground that the games in question constitute games of chance and not games of skill.In doing so the court granted the petitioner–Sumit Kapurbhai Prajapati, liberty to approach the Bombay High Court in an intervention plea in the pending matter and raise the issue there.Court's Jurisdiction U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Against Award Under MSMED Act Is Determined By Agreement Between Parties: Gujarat HCCase title: Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited vs Gupta Power Infrastructure LimitedCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 3The Gujarat High Court bench of Mrs. Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Mr.Justice Pranav Trivedi of has held that the jurisdiction of the Court to hear the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act' 1996 as to challenge the award passed under Section 18(4) of the MSMED Act' 2006, would be governed by the agreement between the parties which has conferred exclusive jurisdiction to a particular Court.Case Transferred To POCSO Court After 8-Yrs Trial: Gujarat HC Says Police, Prosecution & Trial Court Prima Facie Failed In Discharging DutyCase title: Thakor Vipulji Gamaji & Ors. vs State of GujaratCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 4The Gujarat High Court recently lamented the failure on part of the Police, the prosecution and the trial court in an assault case, which came to be transferred to a POCSO Court, eight years after commencement of trial.In his December 24 order, Justice Sandeep Bhatt observed that the victim had "categorically" deposed in her testimony in 2018 that at the time of incident, she was 15 years old. But despite this no actionGujarat High Court Grants Bail To Journalist Mahesh Langa In Cheating Case, To Remain In Custody In Another Case Linked To Alleged GST FraudCase title: Mahesh Langa v State of GujaratCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 5The Gujarat High Court on Thursday (January 9) granted regular bail to journalist Mahesh Langa in a cheating and forgery case registered by the Detection of Crime Branch (DCB) Ahmedabad over allegations of his involvement in a firm which allegedly defrauded government exchequer by availing "bogus" Input Tax Credit.Justice MR Megdey while pronouncing the order said, "Application is Allowed".Subsidiary Supplying To Parent Company In Independent Capacity Cannot Be Considered 'Intermediary Service' U/S 2(13) IGST Act: Gujarat HCCase title: Infodesk India Pvt. Limited Versus The Union Of India & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 6The Gujarat High Court has made it clear that where a subsidiary company provides goods or services to its parent company in its independent capacity, it cannot be said that such services fall under 'intermediary service' under Section 2(13) of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.The provision defines “intermediary” as a broker, an agent or any other person who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services or both, between two or more persons.Mere Initiation Of Proceedings Under Mine & Minerals Act Doesn't Debar Police From Lodging Case For Theft Of Sand/Minerals: Gujarat HCCase title: Ramabhai Jivabhai Keshwala vs State of Gujarat & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 7Referring to a Supreme Court order on illegal mining of sand/minerals, the Gujarat High Court reiterated that even if an offence under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act is made out on which magistrate cannot take cognizance without complaint by authorized officer, it however does not debar police from lodging a case for theft of sand/minerals.Gujarat HC Dismisses PIL Against Bridge Construction At Ahmedabad's Panjrapole Crossing Over Claims Of Reduction In Green CoverCase Title: Dharini Shah & Ors. vs State of Gujarat Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 8The Gujarat High Court on Friday (January 17) dismissed a PIL moved by residents of Ahmedabad pertaining to the construction of a bridge at Panjrapole cross roads over the Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Marg (IIM road), claiming that it will...

Gujarat High Court Annual Digest 2025 [Citations 1 - 240]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags