PM Modi Degree Row| 'Arvind Kejriwal Making Irresponsible Statements Since Begining': Gujarat Varsity Submits In HC In Delhi CM's Review Plea

The Gujarat High Court today held a brief hearing in the review plea filed by the Chief Minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal seeking a review of HC's March 31st order setting aside the 2016 order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) directing the Gujarat University to provide information on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's degree to the AAP national convener.When the matter came up for hearing before the bench of Justice Biren Vaishnav, Kejriwal sought the Court's leave to file a rejoinder affidavit in the case, inter alia, containing a transcript of the previous Court hearing in the matter. Though Gujarat University, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, did not object to the filing of the affidavit, he, however, submitted that the affidavit was served to him at the very last moment and that he had not been able to peruse the same."I can't object to it (rejoinder affidavit) being taken on record (by the Court), it is Court's discretion, but I have not been able to see it...Youtube transcript (is being filed)...This is...Anyway, from my learned friend's client (Kejriwal) nothing is unexpected," said SG Tushar Mehta.Appearing for Kejriwal, Senior Counsel Percy Kavina submitted that the occasion to file the rejoinder affidavit along with the YouTube Transcript emerged primarily due to the fact that in the Court's Judgment, it was wrongly recorded that Kejriwal's Counsel admitted the fact that PM's Degree is available on Gujarat University's website."There are aspects of the submissions made by Gujarat University which were not borne out by their affidavit. In the original Judgment, it was been observed by the Court that I have not objected to the assertion made by the other side (that PM Modi's degree is available on University's website) and your lordship has gone on to say that it is the further reason why the cost of Rs. 25K should be imposed (on Kejriwal)," Senior Counsel Kavina submitted.Here it may be noted that in the review plea, the primary ground for challenging the HC's March 2023 Judgement is that a false claim was made by the Gujarat University that PM Modi's degree is available on its website se as only an Office Register (OR) is available on the website, which is different from the original degree.Our readers may note that during the course of the hearing in the matter, SG Mehta had submitted before the HC that the degree in question is available on the Gujarat University's website and the same could be verified by Kejriwal.In the rejoinder affidavit, it has been stated that during the Court hearing, the Counsel for Kejriwal had not admitted the assertion (made by SG Mehta) that the degree in question is available on the university's website, and rather, this statement was opposed by Kejriwal's counsel, however, the said submission was not recorded by the Court and instead, it was observed that Senior Counsel Kavina had admitted this fact in question.Having heard the brief arguments of both sides, the Court orally observed that whatever is brought to its notice of the bench, it is bound to take the same into account. Further, when the bench asked whether SG Mehta was ready to argue, he submitted thus:"Transcripts milord...I have no difficulty in arguing but without knowing what he has said because we have found in this matter that since the beginning, irresponsible statements are being made, maybe it is there in this rejoinder affidavit also. Let me go through it."In view of this, the Court posted the matter for further hearing on July 21.Kejriwal's review PleaIt may be noted that Kejriwal has sought a review of the HC's judgment on the ground that the said 'degree' is not found on the official website of the Gujarat University and hence, the impugned judgment suffers from the error apparent on the face of the record."That the statement that 'degree' is available on the official website of the Original Petitioner (Gujarat Univeristy) was orally made only on the day of the final hearing i.e, February 9, 2023, without there being any specific pleadings or document produced in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Applicant herein (Kejriwal) could not verify the statement by searching the official website of the Original Petitioner. There was no opportunity for any such verification. That what seems to be uploaded is an 'OR' which cannot be the subject degree' as claimed by the Original Petitioner and hence the statement by Petitioner that 'degree' is uploaded on its official website does not seem to be correct," the review plea states.Kejriwal has also stated that he took the help of persons having special knowledge on the subject to undertake a complete scan of the official website of the Gujarat University and from the said scan, it came out that the 'degree' is not uploaded online as claimed by the University before the HC.Further, the review plea also challenges the imposition of Rs. 25000/- cost on Kejriwal by stating that the proceedings were initiated suo moto by the then...

PM Modi Degree Row| 'Arvind Kejriwal Making Irresponsible Statements Since Begining': Gujarat Varsity Submits In HC In Delhi CM's Review Plea

Sparsh Upadhyay

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

PM Modi Degree Row| 'Arvind Kejriwal Making Irresponsible Statements Since Begining': Gujarat Varsity Submits In HC In Delhi CM's Review Plea

Sparsh Upadhyay

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers