Showkat Yousuf Shah & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 343

Mymoona v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors. connected with M/s Jammu Indore Roadways v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 344

Syed Bilal Ahmad Qadri v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors., WP(C) No. 1857/2026 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 345

BADAVATH KISHAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 346

Laiq Parvez v. Union Territory of J&K through Anti-Corruption Bureau, South Kashmir 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 347

Indian Kayaking and Canoeing Association v. UT of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 348

Ankur Kirtikumar Mehta Vs Bharti Bhachloo 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 349

Shishir Gupta, IAS v. Ufaira Gulzar & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 350

Judgments/Orders:

Public Function Of Imparting Education Alone Does Not Make Army's Op Sadbhavana School Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction J&K&L High Court

Case: Showkat Yousuf Shah & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 343

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the mere fact that an educational institution established under the Army's "Operation Sadbhavana" performs the public function of imparting education does not make every dispute concerning its employees amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

J&K Govt Must Prescribe Procedure For Willow Act Confiscations After Forest Act Repeal: High Court

Case: Mymoona v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors. connected with M/s Jammu Indore Roadways v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 344

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observed that if the Government is serious about effectively enforcing the Jammu & Kashmir Willow (Prohibition of Export and Movement) Act, 2000, it must urgently bridge the legislative vacuum by prescribing a statutory procedure governing seizure and confiscation of willow and vehicles used in alleged violations.

'Becoming A Menace': J&K&L High Court Restrains Alleged Illegal Use Of Srinagar Building As Hotel; Directs ACB To Collect NOC Records

Case Title: Syed Bilal Ahmad Qadri v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors., WP(C) No. 1857/2026.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 345

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observed that unchecked building violations are becoming a menace, leaving law-abiding residents as helpless spectators while municipal authorities, “by design or default”, turn a blind eye until illegal constructions attain completion, forcing aggrieved neighbours into repeated litigation.

GREF Personnel Can Face Disciplinary Action Under Army Act Or CCS (CCA) Rules, Choice Lies With Authority: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: BADAVATH KISHAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 346

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that members of the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF)/Border Roads Organisation (BRO) are subject to a dual disciplinary framework, under which disciplinary proceedings may be initiated either under the Army Act and the Rules framed thereunder or under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, with the choice resting with the competent Disciplinary Authority.

Alleged ₹90 Lakh Embezzlement, Irregular Land Allotments: J&K&L High Court Refuses To Quash Graft Probe Against Ex-DIC GM

Case Title: Laiq Parvez v. Union Territory of J&K through Anti-Corruption Bureau, South Kashmir

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 347

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court refused to quash an Anti-Corruption Bureau FIR against a former General Manager of District Industries Centre (DIC), Pulwama, in a case involving allegations of embezzlement of over ₹90 lakh from the Government treasury and irregular allotment of industrial land even after the concerned estates had been transferred to the State Industrial Corporation of India (SICOP).

National Sports Federation Has No Right To Compel Govt To Relieve Employee For Sporting Assignments: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Indian Kayaking and Canoeing Association v. UT of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 348

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that a National Sports Federation cannot claim a legal right to requisition the services of a Government employee or compel the Government to spare such employees for sporting assignments in the absence of a statutory provision creating such an obligation.

J&K&L High Court Refuses To Quash Drug Quality Case Against Company Directors, Says Responsibility Under Drugs Act Requires Trial

Case Title: Ankur Kirtikumar Mehta Vs Bharti Bhachloo

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 349

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings against three Directors of a pharmaceutical company over the manufacture of a drug declared “Not of Standard Quality”, holding that a Director cannot escape prosecution at the threshold merely by claiming that he had no personal role in the manufacturing process.

Once Maintenance Recovery Warrant Is Issued To Collector, Magistrate Cannot Pursue Parallel Recovery Through Police: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Shishir Gupta, IAS v. Ufaira Gulzar & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 350

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that once a levy warrant for recovery of maintenance is issued to the District Collector under Section 421(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the recovery proceedings shift to the Collector, and the Judicial Magistrate cannot simultaneously pursue an inconsistent mode of recovery,