Zahid Ahmad Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 308

Ravi Kumar v. Union of India & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 309

Muskan @ Shagufta Kousar v. Ashu Raja 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 310

Rama Rani v. Chaman Lal 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 311

Mohammad Shafi Reshi v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 312

Adil Ahmad Sofi v. Javid Ahmad Sofi 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 313

Union Territory of J&K & Anr. v. Firdous Ahmad Itoo & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 314

Dheeraj Pargal v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr. connected with Amit Mahajan & Anr. v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 315

Amit Kundal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 316

Abdul Razzak Beigh v. Altaf Ahmad Khan 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 317

Parvaiz Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J&K and Others 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 318

Rohit Kumar v. Union Territory of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 319

Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Controller, Legal Metrology, Reasi & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 320

Dr. Johns Pvt. Ltd. v. State of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 321

M/s SPBL Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Jammu Power Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 322

Sheikh Abdul Rehman v. Ghulam Nabi Kaboo 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 323

Abdul Wahab Qureshi v. Mohammad Showkat & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 324

Mohd. Yaqoob v. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Jammu and Kashmir and others 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 325

Judgments/Orders:

Alleged Illegal Acts Committed During Juvenility Cannot Justify Preventive Detention After Attaining Majority: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Zahid Ahmad Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 308

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that acts allegedly committed by a person while he was a juvenile cannot subsequently be invoked as the foundation for preventive detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA) after he attains majority.

Battle Casualty Soldier During Kargil War Cannot Be Denied Benefits Because Injury Occurred Outside Kargil Sector: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Ravi Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 309

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a soldier who has admittedly been declared a Battle Casualty and invalidated out of military service during Operation Vijay cannot be denied ex-gratia financial assistance under a welfare scheme merely because his injuries were sustained outside the geographical limits of the Kargil Sector.

Court Cannot Brand Pending Criminal Case Against Father As 'False' To Alter Child's Custody: J&K High Court

Case Title: Muskan @ Shagufta Kousar v. Ashu Raja

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 310

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a court deciding interim custody of a minor cannot prejudge the truthfulness of criminal allegations pending investigation and employ such prima facie conclusions to alter the custody of a child.

Mere Knowledge Of Suit Or Receipt Of Ex Parte Injunction Order Doesn't Trigger 120-Day Limit To File Written Statement: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Rama Rani v. Chaman Lal

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 311

Shedding light on the procedural jurisprudence under the Civil Procedure Code the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that mere knowledge of a civil suit even through receipt of an ex parte injunction order cannot trigger the mandatory 120-day limitation for filing a written statement.

Co-Operative Bank Performing Public Functions Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction Despite Not Being 'State' Under Article 12: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Mohammad Shafi Reshi v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 312

Expanding the contours of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the maintainability of a writ petition no longer depends solely upon whether the respondent is a 'State' under Article 12.

Admission Of Issuing Cheque Alone Can't Be Treated As Plea Of Guilt In S.138 NI Act Case: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Adil Ahmad Sofi v. Javid Ahmad Sofi

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 313

Delineating the limits of summary criminal procedure, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a defence disclosed by an accused while recording his plea under Section 251 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be converted into a plea of guilt merely because the accused admits issuing the cheque or expresses willingness to settle accounts.

Retiral Benefits Cannot Be Withheld Over Suspected Involvement In Criminal Case: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Union Territory of J&K & Anr. v. Firdous Ahmad Itoo & Anr.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 314

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the State cannot place a retired employee's pension and gratuity in indefinite suspension merely because it suspects involvement in a criminal case or contemplates disciplinary action in the future.

Death Of Sole Accused Extinguishes Disproportionate Assets Attachment Proceedings: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Dheeraj Pargal v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr. connected with Amit Mahajan & Anr. v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 315

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that property attachment proceedings initiated during a disproportionate assets investigation cannot acquire an independent existence once the criminal proceedings against the sole accused public servant become legally incapable of continuing.

Domicile Relaxation Available To All; Can't Deprive SC Candidate Of Availing Unreserved Vacancy: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Amit Kundal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 316

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a reserved category candidate cannot be denied adjustment against an unreserved vacancy merely because he has availed a relaxation that is available uniformly to all candidates belonging to a particular region.

Dismissal Of Complaint Before Cognisance Is Not Acquittal, Can Be Challenged Under Section 528 BNSS: J&K&L High Court

Case: Abdul Razzak Beigh v. Altaf Ahmad Khan

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 317

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh clarified the distinction between pre-cognizance dismissal of a criminal complaint and dismissal after issuance of process, holding that only the latter attracts Section 279 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and results in an acquittal appealable under Section 419(4).

Fresh Habeas Corpus Plea By Father Not Maintainable After Major Woman States Choice Of Living With Partner: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Parvaiz Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J&K and Others

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 318

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that once a Coordinate Bench has personally interacted with a major woman, recorded her statement and accepted that she is residing with a person of her own free will, a subsequent Habeas Corpus petition cannot be invoked by her father to secure another judicial examination of the same issue in the absence of fresh material indicating coercion or illegal detention.

Undertrial's Right To Defend Himself, Family Convenience Must Be Considered In Jail Transfer Requests: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Rohit Kumar v. Union Territory of J&K

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 319

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that an application seeking transfer of an undertrial prisoner from one jail to another cannot be rejected solely because neither the accused nor his family resides in the district where the trial is pending.

Different MRPs On Identical Products Was Not Offence Before 2018 Amendment To Metrology Rules: J&K&L High Court Quashes Coca-Cola Case

Case Title: Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Controller, Legal Metrology, Reasi & Anr.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 320

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a manufacturer could not be criminally prosecuted merely for declaring different Maximum Retail Prices (MRPs) on identical pre-packaged commodities when the law, at the relevant time, did not prohibit such differential pricing.

Prosecution Can't Continue If Drug Inspector's Delay Defeats Accused's Right To Re-Test Sample: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Dr. Johns Pvt. Ltd. v. State of J&K

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 321

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that where the acts and omissions of a Drugs Inspector deprive an accused of the valuable statutory right to seek re-testing of a drug sample and adduce evidence in controversion of the Government Analyst's report under Section 25(3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, continuation of the prosecution would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

State Need Not Gamble Public Money On Bidder Whose Credentials Fall 'Under A Cloud': J&K&L High Court

Case Title: M/s SPBL Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Jammu Power Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 322

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that where credible material surfaces before conclusion of a public contract casting doubt on the integrity and eligibility of the successful bidder, the State is constitutionally entitled and indeed duty bound to revisit its decision rather than proceed merely because the bidder has emerged as L-1.

Time Spent Prosecuting Premature Cheque Bounce Complaint Must Be Excluded While Computing Limitation: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Sheikh Abdul Rehman v. Ghulam Nabi Kaboo

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 323

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a complainant who bona fide prosecutes a cheque dishonour complaint which is ultimately found to be premature does not forfeit the statutory cause of action merely because years elapsed in litigation.

Magistrate Can Rely On S.202 CrPC Inquiry To Decline Process Where Complaint Gives Criminal Colour To Civil Dispute: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Abdul Wahab Qureshi v. Mohammad Showkat & Anr.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 324

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that while deciding whether to issue process on a private complaint, a Magistrate is not confined to the averments in the complaint alone but is equally entitled to rely upon the material collected during an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Revenue Authority Must Decide Limitation Before Entertaining Appeal Against 31-Year-Old Mutation: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Mohd. Yaqoob v. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Jammu and Kashmir and others.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 325

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a revenue appellate authority cannot decide the merits of an appeal instituted more than three decades after a mutation without first determining whether such a belated challenge is maintainable in law.