Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025 [Citations: 01 - 36]

Citation 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 01 to 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 36Nominal Index:K Lokesh AND THE BANGALORE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 1M/s Vigneshwara Transport Company v. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax Bengaluru North-West Commissionerate. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 2Heritage Basavanagudi Residents Welfare Forum AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 3Vanitha M AND The Bangalore Development Authority & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 4Rakesh Shetty AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 5Muthoot Finance Limited AND State Of Karnataka & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 6Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited AND Union of India & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 7KARNATAKA FEDERATION OF WOMEN LAWYERS & ANR v. State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 8Organisation for Unaided Recognised Schools & Others AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 9Bowring Institute AND Sarwik S and Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 10J DEEPA AND Superintendent of Police. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 11Kudleepa AND Mahantesh & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 12RAGINI DWIVEDI @ GINI @ RAGS AND State of Karnataka And Connected Matter. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 13High Court Legal Service Authority AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 14The Registrar (Evaluation) AND S V Renu & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 15Prajwal Revanna AND State Of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 16Amrutha M & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 17MD Imran Reza AND NoBroker Technologies Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 18Central Warehousing Corporation AND G C Bhat & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 19ABC AND XYZ. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 20Shekhar AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 21The Income Tax Officer & ANR Preeti V. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 22K S Vishwa Kiran And State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 23Shipoil Limited AND MT Standorf. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 24B Ashok Kumar AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 25The Registrar General AND Union of India & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 26Shilpa Kiran & ANR And State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 27M/s Renram Fashions India Pvt Ltd AND The ESI Corporation. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 28Vikas C V & Others AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 29 V Keshavamurthy AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 30Hindustan Aeronautics Officers Guild AND Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 31Dr Natesha D B AND Directorate of Enforcement. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 32Sushil Kumar Churiwala AND Akshay Bansal. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 33Prafula M Bhat & Others AND Saraswati Shahstri & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 34ABC AND State Of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 35BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE v. M/S ASHOKA BIOGREEN PVT. LTD. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 36Judgments/OrdersChildren/Third Parties Cannot Appeal Against Maintenance Order Passed Under Parents & Senior Citizens Act: Karnataka High CourtCase Title: K Lokesh AND THE BANGALORE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & OthersCase No: WRIT APPEAL No. 254 OF 2024Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 1The Karnataka High Court has held that the right of appeal against an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, is only available to senior citizens and parents and no such right is extended to children or third parties.A division bench of Chief Justice N V Anjaria and Justice K V Aravind held thus while partly allowing an appeal filed by K Lokesh. The court said “The only reasonable interpretation of Section 16 of the Act is that the right of appeal is vested exclusively in senior citizens or parents, and not in any other individuals, including children or transferees.”When Investigation Is Substantially Completed By Improper Officer, SCN Issued U/S 74 Of CGST Act Is Liable To Be Set Aside: Karnataka HCCase Title: M/s Vigneshwara Transport Company v. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax Bengaluru North-West CommissionerateCase Number: WRIT PETITION NO.18305 OF 2023 (T-RES)Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 2The Karnataka High Court held that when investigation is substantially completed by improper officer, show cause notice issued by proper officer u/s 74 of CGST Act is liable to be set aside.The Bench of Justice M.I. Arun observed that “…..substantial part of the investigation including search and seizure of the materials has been done by respondent no.2 who is not the proper Officer and under the circumstances, the said investigation, inspection, search and seizure in respect of the assessee herein has to be considered ab initio void…..”Karnataka High Court Rejects PIL Against Re-Modeling Of Bengaluru's Gandhi Bazaar, Says It's For Larger Public ConvenienceCase Title: Heritage Basavanagudi Residents Welfare Forum AND State of Karnataka & OthersCase No: WRIT PETITION NO. 5330...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025 [Citations: 01 - 36]

Mustafa Plumber

Tags