Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 70 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 93Nominal Index:X v/s Y 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 70Naseem Uddin Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P) And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 71Vinod Kumar Meena Versus Life Insurance Corporation Of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 72Nitin Gautam Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 73Dharmendra And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh Department Of Urban Development And Housing And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 74Law Students Association Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 75Smt. Preeti Gehlod Versus M.P. State Election Commission And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 76Mangalsharan Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 77Ashok Kumar Tripathi Versus State Of M.P And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 78Dr. Jayshree Dubey vs. The Central Information Commissioner And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 79Raghuraj Gurjar Alias Raju Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 80Sourav Gurjar And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 81Sarvottam Suyash Clinic And Fertility Centre v/s State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 82JK Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 83Sunita Gupta Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh School Education Department And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 84Atul versus Union Of India And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 85Vivek Dwivedi Versus Union Of India Ministry Of Jal Shakti Department Of Water Resources River Development And Ganga Rej And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 86Ramu @ Manvendra Singh Gurjar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 87Arpit Kumar Bhana Versus Union Bank Of India And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 88P C Shamra (Prakash Mangilal Sharma) Versus Shri Bhagwandas Sahbnani 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 89H.K. Kalchuri Educational Trust And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 90Subhash Singh Tomar Versus Union Of India Through Its Secretary And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 91Mahendra Singh Taram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 92Kamlabai Versus Rajendra Singh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 93Final Orders/Judgements:Section 25 HMA | Spouse Can't Be Directed To Pay Permanent Alimony In Absence Of An Application: Madhya Pradesh High Court ReiteratesCase Title: X v/s YCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 70The Madhya Pradesh High Court reiterated that without filing a formal application–either written or separate–under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), a spouse cannot be directed to pay permanent alimony.Section 25 pertains to Permanent alimony and maintenance. It states that any court exercising jurisdiction under HMA may, at the time of passing any decree or at any time subsequent thereto, on an "application made to it for the purpose by either the wife or the husband", as the case may be, order that the respondent shall pay to the applicant for her or his maintenance and support a "gross sum or such monthly or periodical sum for a term not exceeding the life of the applicant".Baseless Allegations Of Communal Bias By Govt Employee To Stall Transfer Would Lead To Serious Breach In Executing Administrative Orders: MP HCCase Title: Naseem Uddin Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P) And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 71While hearing a petition challenging a transfer order on the ground of religious discrimination, the Indore Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court said that if such unsubstantiated allegations are allowed to be entertained on their face value, it would lead to serious breach in execution of administrative orders. The Court dismissed the petition noting that the petitioner could not demonstrate any mala fide intention on the part of the State.Biometrics Are Necessary To Eliminate Discrepancies, But Failure Of Machine To Recognize A Person Cannot Override Their Fundamental Rights: MP HCCase Title: Vinod Kumar Meena Versus Life Insurance Corporation Of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 72The Indore Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a person's legal and fundamental right cannot be curtailed only on account of failure of a biometric machine to recognize him.'Fraud Vitiates Everything': MP High Court Orders Removal Of Shivpuri's Malaria Technical Supervisor For Filing Fake Experience CertificateCase Title: Nitin Gautam Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 73While ordering immediate removal of a Malaria Technical Supervisor in Shivpuri, the Madhya Pradesh High Court expressed concern over fraud played on the selection committee and filing of fraudulent documents in selection process of government service calling it a serious issue which cannot be ignored.In doing so, the Court quashed the selection of the candidate on the post of Malaria Technical Supervisor after finding that he had filed a "forged experience certificate".Madhya...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Anukriti Mishra

Tags