Madras High Court Monthly Digest: February 2026 [Citations 51-94]

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 52 To 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 94 NOMINAL INDEX Kottaisamy and Others v. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 52 C Joseph Vijay v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 53 Rathinam v. The Superintendent of Police and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 54 Mukesh Sharma v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 55 Mr. D. Kaliyamoorthy v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 56 Pradeep Rajan v. State of Tamil Nadu and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 57 M/s KVN Productions v. Central Board of Film Certification and another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 58 M/s. Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. v M/s. Ad Bureau Advertising Pvt Ltd, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 59 Jawahar Rajan v The Regional Passport Officer and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 60 Mahendra Singh Dhoni v. Zee Media Corporation Limited, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 61 High Court Of Madras v. Ashok Surana, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 62 Railway Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd v. The Appellate Authority and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 63 Bhagavathiraj v. State, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 64 N.Kumar v. District Collector and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 65 Joseph Raja v Inspector of Police, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 66 N Ganesh Agarwal v. The Inspector of Police, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 67 The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department & Ors. v. K. Marimuthu & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 68 The Accountant General v. M Radhakrishnan and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 69 S Muneeswaran and Another v. State, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 70 Government of Tamil Nadu and Others v. M Rajesh Kumar, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 71 Nagarajan v. The District Collector and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 72 M/s. Seyadu Beedi Company v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 73 Tamizhaga Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam v The Chief Election Commissioner and another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 74 KMC College of Law v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 75 Under Secretary to Government and Others v. Dr Ajitha and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 76 Sowdhamani v. The Inspector of Police, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 77 N Samaran v. The Commissioner and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 78 KS Balakrishnan v. The District Collector and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 79 K. Athinarayanan v. The State, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 80 M/s. Pattali Makkal Katchi v. Election Commission of India and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 81 V Shiva v. The Inspector General of Registration and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 82 The Secretary to Government, Education Department & Others v. N.K. Shankar, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 83 Union of India and Others v. B Shankar Kumar, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 84 MIOT Hospitals Private Limited v. Dr.Balaraman Palaniappan, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 85 Chellamanickam v. The Principle Secretary and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 86 Vaiko v Union of India and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 87 B Shyam and Another v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 88 Tamil Nadu Development Foundation Trust and another v. Government of India, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 89 Mrs Magitha Anna Christy v. State Human Rights Commission and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 90 M Kalaiselvi v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 91 C. Ve. Shanmugam v. The Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 92 MS Murugan v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 93 VBR Menon v. The Chief Controller of Explosives and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 94 REPORTS Madras High Court Directs POCSO Accused To Pay ₹25K Cost To Victim After Advocate Names Her In Cause Title Case Title: Kottaisamy and Others v. The State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 52 The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) recently imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the accused booked under the POCSO Act after finding that the name of the survivor/victim was explicitly mentioned by their counsel in the cause title of the criminal petition. A bench of Justice L Victoria Gowri strongly condemned the conduct of the petitioners' counsel and further directed that the said amount be paid to the survivor. Madras High Court Dismisses Plea By Actor Vijay Challenging 1.5 Crore Income Tax Penalty Case Title: C Joseph Vijay v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 53 The Madras High Court has dismissed a plea filed by Actor Vijay challenging the Rs. 1.5 crore penalty imposed on him by the Income Tax Department for undisclosed income of Rs 15 crore in the financial year 2015-16. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that the show cause notice had been issued within the two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. As the court found no infirmity in the issuance of the notice, it refrained from examining the other aspects of the ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest: February 2026 [Citations 51-94]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags