LiveLaw Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

Nominal Index [Citations 176 - 212] XXXXX v. XXXX 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 176Sukhdev Singh @ Rinku v. State of Punjab 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 177 Dr. Rohit Lalit and others v. State of Haryana and another 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 178 Anil Kumar Kaushik v. State of Punjab 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 179COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. JYOTI MALHOTRA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 180KARAM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 181Rajkumar Yadav @Rajkumar Rao v. State of Punjab and another 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 182Gurjinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 183Manpreet Kaur v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 184SUSHMA VALENCIA APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 185Ashok Kumar Goel and others v. Union of India and others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 186Ravi Shankar and others v. State of Haryana 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 187Dishant Goel v. Union Of India & Others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 188Ashok Khemka v. Union of India and another 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 189 Ravi Shankar and others v. State of Haryana 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 190 SWATI YADAV v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 191 ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMA v. RAMA RANI SHARMA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 192 Sarwan Singh @ Samma Singh & Others v. Sukhraj Kaur & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 193 ROHIT LALIT v. SOURABH CHABBRA 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 194Narender Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr. 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 195Manjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and others2026 LiveLaw (PH) 196JITENDER SINGH ALIAS JEETU v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION BAHIN, DISTRICT PALWAL, HARYAN 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 197AMIT DEWAN v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATON 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 198X AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 199Poonam @ Indira v. Prahlad Sharma and others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 200.VIRENDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. JITENDER KUMAR IAS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 201Maninderjeet Singh v. Facebook Meta Platform INC and others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 202CHANDIGARH GOLF CLUB v. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANOTHER 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 203UNION OF INDIA v. USHA SINGLA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 204Surinder Kumar v. Union of India and others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 205PRIYAWART AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 206ANURAG KHULLAR @ VISHAL v. U.T. Chandigarh 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 207Vardhman Ranjan v. State of Haryana and Another 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 208Gurwinder Singh @ Baba v. National Investigating Agency, Delhi: 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 209 Ranbir Singh and others v. Haryana State through Collector, Fatehabad 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 210Fatima Maqsood v. Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 211Jagwinder Singh @ Joginder Singh v. Ramandeep Khimareet Kaur and others 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 212ReportsSingle Incident Of Spouse Meeting Former Partner Would Not Alone Amount To Adultery: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: XXXXX v. XXXXCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 176The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld a family court order which had held that a single instance of a spouse meeting a former partner alone cannot, by itself, amount to adultery. At the same time, the Court reiterated that making false and reckless allegations against a spouse and their family members constitutes mental cruelty warranting divorce.Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill and Justice Ramesh Kumar noted, "trial Court in its rightful wisdom also observed that conduct of respondent-wife in meeting respondent No.2 alone on 11.01.2023 being a single incident cannot be said that she is living in adultery with respondent No.2 nor her previous relationship with respondent No.2 before marriage tantamount to an offence of adultery for the respondent-husband. Learned trial Court rightly dissolved the marriage between the parties on the ground of cruelty on part of respondent-wife."Invoking Wrong Provision No Bar To Challenge Curtailment Of Liberty: P&H High Court Grants Man Bail Accused Of Putting Pro-Khalistan PostersTitle: Sukhdev Singh @ Rinku v. State of PunjabCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 177The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that invoking an incorrect statutory provision while filing a bail appeal under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) cannot defeat an accused's substantive right to challenge curtailment of liberty.In doing so the Court granted bail to an accused booked under UAPA, noting his prolonged incarceration of over four and a half years and lack of strong incriminating evidence.Grievous Hurt Charge Cannot Be Framed Without Supporting Medical Evidence: P&H High Court Modifies Charges In Assault CaseTitle: Dr. Rohit Lalit and others v. State of Haryana and anotherCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (PH) 178The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that in cases where the nature of injuries forms the foundation of criminal charges, courts must primarily rely on objective medical evidence, and cannot proceed on speculative or exaggerated claims. The Court modified the charges framed against the accused, holding that offences relating to “grievous...

LiveLaw Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

Aiman J. Chishti

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Aiman J. Chishti

LiveLaw Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

Aiman J. Chishti

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Aiman J. Chishti

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers