Pensioner Has Duty To Inform Authorities If Full Pension Is Paid Despite Commutation, Recovery Valid: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that where a pensioner continues to receive full pension despite having already received the commuted value of pension, it is the pensioner's duty to inform the authorities if the department inadvertently fails to make the stipulated monthly deductions. The Court observed that a pensioner cannot retain amounts wrongly received due to such an administrative mistake, particularly when the Pension Payment Order itself clearly provides for the deductions.A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Subhash Upadhyay was hearing a writ petition challenging a communication issued by the Senior Treasury Officer directing recovery of the commuted portion of pension through monthly deductions. The petitioner had opted for commutation of pension and received a lump sum of ₹18,99,697. Under the Pension Payment Order, monthly deductions were to commence from November 2017 and continue till August 2025. However, owing to an inadvertent departmental error, no deductions were made, and the petitioner continued receiving full pension until the mistake was detected during an audit, following which the authorities ordered an additional deduction of ₹20,000 per month towards recovery of the amount that ought to have been deducted earlier.The petitioner contended that the mistake was entirely attributable to the Department and, therefore, no recovery could be effected from him. It was also argued that, being a retired employee, the petitioner depended upon his pension for livelihood and that the monthly recovery was excessive. The Court held that the petitioner was equally under an obligation to point out the obvious error when he continued receiving full pension despite the Pension Payment Order expressly providing for monthly deductions on account of commutation. Having accepted the lump sum commutation amount and thereafter continued to draw the unreduced pension without informing the Department, the petitioner could not claim a right to retain the excess amount.“… when inadvertently, the petitioner was paid full amount of pension, without making monthly deductions, though the same was stipulated in the Pension Payment Order, it was also duty of the petitioner to have pointed out the said mistake to the Department,” the Court observed. The Bench also rejected the challenge to the rate of recovery, observing that the additional deduction of ₹20,000 per month would still require several years to recover the outstanding amount and that the Government was not levying any interest, while the petitioner continued to receive a substantial monthly pension.Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the writ petition and declined to interfere with the recovery proceedings initiated by the Treasury Department.Case Title: Govind Ballabh Pandey v. Directorate of Treasury Pension and Entitlement Uttarakhand Dehradun & Anr. [Writ Petition (S/B) No. 85 of 2026]Click Here To Read/Download Order

Pensioner Has Duty To Inform Authorities If Full Pension Is Paid Despite Commutation, Recovery Valid: Uttarakhand High Court

Saksham Vaishya

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Saksham Vaishya

Pensioner Has Duty To Inform Authorities If Full Pension Is Paid Despite Commutation, Recovery Valid: Uttarakhand High Court

Saksham Vaishya

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Saksham Vaishya

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers