Intellectual Property Rights Weekly Round-Up: December 08–14, 2025

NOMINAL INDEX Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Speedways Tyre Treads & Anr., CS(COMM) 1155/2025 Gajulapalli Mallikarjuna v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Criminal Revision Case No. 1840/2008 Swami Vidyanand v. Cristiana Amodei Chiarello & Ors., CS (COMM) No. 317/2025 Rao and Sapru Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Alok Kumar, IA-6542-2025 in Comm IP Suit No. 618/2025 Himalaya Wellness Company v. Greenland Trading Company, 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1693 DAZN Limited & Anr. v. Back.methstreamer.com & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1694 TVS Motor Company v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 475 Cosco India Ltd. v. M/s B.K. Traders, CS (COMM) No. 1612/2019 Novo Nordisk & Anr. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, CS(COMM) 1308/2025 Saregama India Limited v. Black Madras Films & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1696 Marico Limited v. Minolta Natural Care, IA(L) 28667/2025 in Commercial IP (L) 28094/2025 Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. v. Jagpin Breweries Ltd & Ors., Comm IP Suit No. 19/2006 Dabur India Ltd v. Wellford Pharmaceutical Private Limited & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1710 Delhi Public School Society v. Delhi Public School International Bhiwadi, 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1695 S Chand and Company Ltd. v. Kaushal Kumar & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1696 CSJ Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Akash Kohli & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1697 Novo Nordisk v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1700 Federal Express Corporation v. Fedex Securities Private Ltd. & Ors., IA 820/2021 in Comm IPR Suit No. 1406/2019 Dabur India Limited v. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd., APO/27/2022 Street One GMBH v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1704 Elsevier Ltd. & Ors. v. Alexandra Elbakyan & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1707 Konidala Pawan Kalyan v. Ashok Kumar John Doe & Ors. Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao v. Ashok Kumar John Doe & Ors. Sunil Gavaskar v. Cricket Tak & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1698 Salman Khan v. Ashok Kumar John Doe & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1693 Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd v. Mohalla Tech Private Limited, 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1691 HIGH COURT REPORTS Patents Act, 1970 Madras High Court Orders Fresh Review of TVS Motor's Patent Plea For Scooter Frame Design Case Title: TVS Motor Company Limited v. The Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 475 The Madras High Court set aside Patent Office's refusal of TVS Motor Company's patent application relating to a vehicle frame assembly. The Court found that Controller's analysis on lack of inventive step was inadequate and did not properly assess the claimed invention in light of the cited prior art. It observed that prior art relied upon did not disclose the specific structural arrangement claimed by TVS. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration. After Dr Reddy's, Sun Pharma Commits To Not Selling Semaglutide In India Till March 2026 Case Title: Novo Nordisk & Anr. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Case No.: CS(COMM) 1308/2025 The Delhi High Court recorded Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.'s assurance that it will not sell its semaglutide-based drug in India until March 20, 2026, when Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk's patent expires. The company also committed to exporting drug only to countries where Novo does not hold patent rights. Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Order Allowing Dr. Reddy's To Manufacture And Export Semaglutide Case Title: Novo Nordisk v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1700 In a patent infringement action relating to semaglutide, the Delhi High Court refused to grant interim relief in favour of Novo Nordisk. The Court observed that the defendants had raised substantial and credible challenges to the patent. It held that the matter required full trial and detailed examination of evidence. As a result, no stay on single bench order was granted at this stage. Trade Marks Act, 1999 Delhi High Court Summons Woodland's MD and Senior Manager In Trademark Infringement Suit Case Title: Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Speedways Tyre Treads & Anr. Case No.: CS(COMM) 1155/2025 The Delhi High Court summoned the Managing Director and Senior Manager of Woodland to explain alleged non-disclosure of material correspondence in a trademark infringement suit. The Court found prima facie material suggesting concealment of relevant documents. It noted that such non-disclosure could affect the fairness of proceedings. Woodland was directed to deposit ₹30 lakh towards the value of seized goods. Delhi High Court Temporarily Bars Local Supplier From Using 'HIMALAYA' Mark For Ayurvedic Products Case Title: Himalaya Wellness Company & Ors. v. Greenland Trading Company Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1693 The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte...

Intellectual Property Rights Weekly Round-Up: December 08–14, 2025

Ayushi Shukla

Tags