Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: April 2022 [Citations 91 - 131]

Urmila sen and anr. V. The state of madhya pradesh and anr. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 91 Jagdish arora and anr v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 92 Dadhibal Prasad Jaiswal V Smt. Sunita Jaiswal 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 93 Smt. Farha @ Premlata and ors v Indore Municipal Corporation and ors. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 94 DR. SURYA TIWARI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 95 Smt. Kala Devi v State of M.P. and others 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 96 Dilip alias Kalu Pal Vs. State of M.P. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 97 Amrutlal Sanghani and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 98 Kishor Choudhary v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr., with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 99 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DHAR v. NASREEM 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 100 Prakash Singh and Nandita Singh v. State of MP and anr 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 101 Nirman Sagar Vs. Smt. Monika Sagar Chaudhari and another 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 102 Rajesh Bhoyale v. Smt. Mahadevi 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 103 AHMED FAIZ v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 104 Alok Lodhi & Ors. Vs. State of MP & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 105 Anil Kumar Tripathi Vs. Doorsanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 106 Dr. Mohita Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 107 The State Of Madhya Pradesh V Shyam Sundar Sharma 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 108 INDRAJEET PATEL v. THE STATE OF M.P. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 109 Parag Pandit V Smt.Sadhana 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 110 Parenteral Drugs (India) Limited versus Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt Ltd 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 111 STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. VERSUS SMT. NIRMALA RAWAT 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 112 B.P.@ AMRAT SINGH GURJAR VS. STATE OF M.P. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 113 Adroit Industries (India) Ltd. v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 114 FATHER OF PROSECUTRIX-X v STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 115 ABHISHEK v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 116 Smt. Kamla Sharma and others Vs. Sukhdevlal and others 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 117 RAVISH SOOD ALIAS AMAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 118 AMITABHA GUPTA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 119 The Prosecutrix Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 120 Rajaram and ors v State Of MP 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 121 BANTU ROHRA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 122 Vipin Rajput Vs. State of MP 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 123 Fareeda Bee V The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 124 ABHIJEET CHAUDHARY AND ORS. v. M.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER, with connected matters. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 125 Technosteel Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 126 Brijmohan Sharma Vs. State of M.P. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 127 Rajveer Singh Jatav Vs. State of MP 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 128 NEERAJ v. SUDHIR AGRAWAL AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 129 Sandeep Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 130 Devendra Lodhi Vs. State of M.P. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 131 ROUNDUP OF THE MONTH Incumbent Upon Trial Court To Fix Amount For Bail Bond Once High Court Orders Release Of Accused: Madhya Pradesh HC Case Title: Urmila sen and anr. V. The state of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 91 The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the lower court to ascertain the value of bail bond of the Applicant who was granted bail by the High Court, without mentioning the bail amount. The Court further directed the trial court to remain cautious while dealing with a bail order, as it had refused to ascertain amount for bail bond despite being made aware of the decision of the Apex Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. High Court Can Exercise Inherent Jurisdiction U/S 482 CrPC To Modify Bail Conditions, S.362 CrPC Not Bar: Madhya Pradesh HC Case Title: Jagdish arora and anr v. Union of india Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 92 The Madhya Pradesh High Court amended a condition of Bail of two persons accused of tax evasion, which would consequently allow them to travel abroad 'in furtherance of their business and professional pursuits.' The division bench of Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice M.S. Bhatti was essentially dealing with an application under Section 482 CrPC moved by the Applicants accused under Section 132(1)(a) and 132(1)(i) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, seeking amendment in one of their conditions for bail, which would allow them to travel to Germany for business purposes. Order Disposing Application U/S 91 CrPC Interlocutory, No Revision Lies Against It: Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Title : Dadhibal Prasad Jaiswal V Smt. Sunita Jaiswal Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 93 The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently set aside the order of lower court allowing revision against rejection of application under Section 91 CrPC, reiterating that the impugned order was interlocutory in...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: April 2022 [Citations 91 - 131]

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags