Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Rajesh Panayanthatta

Rajesh Panayanthatta

    Demand Notice Issued By Lawyer On Behalf Of Operational Creditor Can’t Be Treated As Demand Notice Required Under Sec.8(1) Of I & B Code: NCLAT

    Demand Notice Issued By Lawyer On Behalf Of Operational Creditor Can’t Be Treated As Demand Notice Required Under Sec.8(1) Of I & B Code: NCLAT

    The judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), in Macquarie Bank Limited vs Uttam Galva Metallilcs Limited (Company Appeal (AT) (Insol) No. 96/2017), which is further followed in...

    11 Oct 2017 9:43 AM GMT
    Pendency Of Execution Petitions Or Appeals Under Sec.37 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Not A Bar To Initiate Insolvency Resolution Process; NCLAT [Read Judgment]

    Pendency Of Execution Petitions Or Appeals Under Sec.37 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Not A Bar To Initiate Insolvency Resolution Process; NCLAT [Read Judgment]

    It was quite uncertain as to whether the preference of an Appeal under Sec.37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the dismissal of the objection under Sec.34 would amount to 'an...

    31 Aug 2017 2:02 PM GMT