Madras High Court Monthly Digest - December 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 375 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 413 NOMINAL INDEX G.Selvamoorthy v The Chief Engineer (Personnel), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 375 K Annamalai v V Piyush, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 T Ganesan v Government of India and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 377 State of Tamil Nadu v K Parvathy, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 378 S.Uttam Chand Versus ACIT, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 379 S Muthu Kumar v The Cabinet Secretary and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 380 M Palani v The State and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 381 All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Another v All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 382 S Jagathrakshakan and Others v The Special Director, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 383 K Krishna and Another v The Managing Director and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 384 P.Maheswari v The Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 385 S. Panneerselvam v. The Principal Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 386 State v RS Rajesh, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 387 Thol Thirumaavalan v The Principal Secretary, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 388 C Mani v Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 389 Sri Subramaniyaswami, Thirukovil Sundhanthirai Paribalana Sthalatharkal Sabha v. The Commissioner, HR&CE, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 390 Asif Musthaheen v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 391 Mahendra Singh Dhoni v. G Sampath Kumar, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 392 R Sumathi v Secretary to Government, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 393 J Vivek v Principal Secretary and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 394 Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) v Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 395 CSI College of Dental Sciences and Research v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 396 Mohamed Rifas @ Mohamed Rigbas v Union of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 397 State v K Ponmudi and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 398 C Alagappan v The State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 399 Ankit Tiwari v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 400 Eicher Motors Ltd v Nitin Service Point and Automobiles, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 401 P Mohanraj v The District Collector and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 402 VBR Menon v The Additional Chief Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 403 Mansoor Ali Khan v Trisha Krishnan and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 404 C.Chellamuthu Versus The Principal Commissioner, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 405 The Chennimalai Siragiri Murugan Primary Handloom Weaver's Cooperative Society Ltd v Income Tax Officer, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 406 Pandiarajan C v The District Collector and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 407 University of Madras v Dr. UT Manisundar (Died) and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 408 M/s.Cognizant Technology Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 409 PK Mukmuthu Sha v PS Mohammed Afrin Banu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 410 R Suresh Kumar v The Principal Secretary to Government, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 411 A Vasanthi v S Jayakumar, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 412 M/s.Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Versus DCIT, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 413 REPORTS [Service Jurisprudence] When Two Views Regarding Punishment Or Penalty Are Possible, View Favouring Employee Must Be Adopted: Madras High Court Case Title: G.Selvamoorthy v The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 375 The Madras High Court has recently observed that in service jurisprudence when two interpretations could be given to rules relating to penalty and punishment, the one favourable to the employee should be given effect. In allowing the plea by directing an enhancement in the petitioner's retirement benefits, Justice RN Manjula observed that since service jurisprudence was similar to penal jurisprudence due to the imposition of a penalty, such a view, akin to one taken in penal jurisprudence while giving the accused the benefit of doubt, could be imported to service jurisprudence as well. 'No Locus For Complainant': Madras High Court Stays Proceedings In Defamation Case Against BJP State Head K. Annamalai Case Title: K Annamalai v V Piyush Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 The Madras High Court has recently stayed all further proceedings against Tamil Nadu BJP Head K Annamalai in the defamation case filed by one V Piyush. Justice G Jayachandran observed that prima facie, a case had been made out to quash the defamation complaint, as Piyush failed to establish his locus standi. The case pertains to alleged hate speech made by Annamalai against a Christian Missionary NGO. The leader is stated to have said that it was the Christian NGO that first approached the Supreme Court to ban crackers during Diwali. In October this year, the Tamil Nadu Government had accorded sanction to prosecute Annamalai. In his legal opinion, State Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohammed Jinnah stated that Annamalai had intentionally and out of...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - December 2023

Upasana Sajeev

Tags