Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

8 April 2026 10:47 AM IST

  • Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]
    Listen to this Article

    A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing the Constitutional issues referred to the larger bench in the Sabarimala review.

    This is the second day of the hearing.

    Apart from CJI Surya Kant, the Bench comprises Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice MM Sundresh, Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Justice Aravind Kumar, Justice Augustine George Masih, Justice Prasanna B Varale, Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.

    Reports from Day 1 Hearing are given below :

    Not Reviewing Sabarimala Verdict In Reference; Only Considering Constitutional Questions, Says Supreme Court



    Live Updates

    • 8 April 2026 11:16 AM IST

      SG Mehta: I read Shirur Mutt, Ratanlal Gandhi and Devaru-what is common is the person affected filed the petition. Dargah Committee says a completely different route. In this, the government took over the administration of khawaja moin uddin chishti dargah and the dargah committee itself approached the court

    • 8 April 2026 11:11 AM IST

      counsels arguing on the allotment of time and when and who will argue

    • 8 April 2026 11:07 AM IST

      CJI: we request both side to use minimum oral arguments

      Dhavan: i will make oral arguments and refer to written arguments

      Adv Nedumpura: non-designated advocates will be ignored?

    • 8 April 2026 11:05 AM IST

      CJI: we understand there is apprehension that we won't read but the idea of listing this in april is to utilise our summer break

    • 8 April 2026 11:04 AM IST

      SG Mehta: after my submissions the other nuances on the same line can be placed and then Dhavan can submit

      CJI: it will create problem for us, let Dhavan say whatever he wants to

    • 8 April 2026 11:03 AM IST

      CJI: we will allow him to complete, and then we simply follow the order of seniority.

      counsels arguing that those appearing for review petitioners should be allowed

      Dhavan: mylords are not deciding the review petition

    • 8 April 2026 11:03 AM IST

      Dhavan: I have great reservations with what mr solicitor argued and he very candidly said that many on this side would disagree with the proposition

      SG Mehta: not all

      Dhavan: will you keep quit? this is the undignified and uncivilised silence

    • 8 April 2026 11:03 AM IST

      Dhavan: it is singularly impossible to accommodate, your lordships say you will read our written submission, you won't. mylords are the most overworked judges in the world. there is no way you will read the way we want

    • 8 April 2026 11:03 AM IST

      Reading begins.

      Sr Adv Rajeev Dhavan: this is not a review petition and in earlier days we used to start by seniority or we started with main counsel. if we go home tomorrow, our hard work we put for last six weeks

      SG Mehta: I don't think mylords

      Dhavan: kindly stop, you have a habit of interrupting

      SG Mehta: dignified silence is my response

      Dhavan: then stop

    • 8 April 2026 10:47 AM IST

      #SupremeCourt to continue hearing Sabarimala reference where larger issues concerning restriction of entry of women to Dargah, practice of FGM and ex-communication in the Dawoodi Bohra, and ex-communication of Parsi women after marrying a non-Parsi man have been raised.

    Next Story