Supreme Court Seeks States' Responses To Applications Seeking Stay Of Anti-Conversion Laws

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (September 16) asked various States to file their responses to applications seeking a stay of the laws enacted by them dealing with religious conversions.The bench of CJI BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing the batch of petitions challenging the constitutionality of laws in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand and Karnataka dealing with religious conversions.The bench granted four weeks' time to the States for their responses. The matter will be heard after six weeks.Senior Advocate Chander Uday Singh, for Citizens for Justice and Peace, submitted that there was great urgency in hearing the matter, as States are amending the laws to make these laws more stringent. Although these laws are called the "Freedom of Religion Act", they are curtailing the religious freedom of minorities and targeting interfaith marriages and religious practices, he commented. He said that in 2024, the Uttar Pradesh law was amended to increase the punishment for unlawful religious conversion through marriage a minimum of twenty years, which can extend up to life imprisonment for the remainder of one's life. Also, bail conditions have been made more stringent, with the introduction of "twin conditions" as found in the PMLA. The amendment also allows third parties to file complaints. He said that huge amounts of harassment are faced by people in interfaith marriages, in normal observances in church, etc by vigilante mobs.Singh told the bench that he has filed applications seeking stay of the impugned legislations. Advocate Vrinda Grover, for the National Federation of Indian Women, also informed the bench that her client has also filed a similar application to stay the laws.The bench was also informed that the Gujarat High Court, in 2021, had stayed certain provisions of the Gujarat religious conversion law. A similar stay order was passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court as well. These States have approached the Supreme Court challenging the interim orders of the respective High Courts. The bench told Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, representing the respondent-States, to file the responses to the stay applications. Senior Advocates Indira Jaising, Sanjay Hegde, MR Shamshad, Sanjay Parikh etc., appeared for other parties opposing the laws.The bench appointed Advocates Srishti Agnihotri and Ruchira Goel as the nodal counsel from the sides of the petitioners and respondents respectively to prepare the compilations.The bench also de-tagged the PIL filed by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyaya seeking a pan-Indian law to criminalise conversion through coercion and deceipt. When Upadhyaya said he was seeking a central legislation against deceitful conversions, CJI Gavai asked, "Who will decide what is a deceitful conversion?".The present challenge is to the validity of various state laws which penalise unlawful conversions to other faiths. The bench of then CJI, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha issued notice in the matter in January 2020.Later on, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind filed a transfer petition in the Supreme Court seeking to transfer to it 21 cases pending in 6 High Courts challenging the laws relating to religious conversions enacted by various states.Out of the 6 High Courts, where these Petitions are pending – Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh, in two States i.e. Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, partial stay have been granted with regards the provisions of the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act, 2003 (as amended in 2021) and the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 2021 by the respective High Courts of the concerned States.Case Details : Citizens for Justice And Peace v. State of Uttar Pradesh And Anr. WP(Crl) No. 428/2020 and connected matters

Supreme Court Seeks States' Responses To Applications Seeking Stay Of Anti-Conversion Laws

Anmol Kaur Bawa

The States such as UP, Haryana, MP, Gujarat, Haryana, Uttarakhand, HP etc were given 4 weeks ' time for their responses.

Tags