Trending
Bombay High Court Restrains Filmmaker Santosh Kumar From Making Defamatory Comments Against Aditya Dhar Over 'Dhurandhar' Script
In a temporary respite for Aditya Dhar, director of the recently released Bollywood film Dhurandhar, the Bombay High Court on Wednesday restrained filmmaker Santosh Kumar from making any comments regarding the film, which could be defamatory. Single-judge Justice Arif Doctor heard the brief submissions of senior advocate Dr Birendra Saraf who represented Dhar and urged the court to pass at...
Assam College Employees Act | Family Pension Available To Employees Retired/Deceased Before 2005, Subject To CPF Refund: Gauhati HC
The Gauhati High Court has held that pension and family pension under the Assam College Employees (Provincialisation) Act, 2005 extend to employees who had retired or died prior to its commencement, and that denying such benefit on the ground of “retrospective” applicability is “an absurd proposition.”Justice Rajesh Mazumdar, presiding over the case, observed, “There is no quarrel...
'Crores Of Public Money Spent': Kerala High Court Directs Audit Of Vigilance Tribunals After Noting Only 5 Cases Disposed Of Annually
The Kerala High Court has ordered the State government to conduct a performance audit of the two Vigilance Tribunals formed under the State Civil Service (Vigilance Tribunal) Rules, after noting that the maximum five cases were disposed off by the tribunal annually while the expenditure incurred exceeded Rs. 1 crore. This the court said executive must remember that public money amounting...
Merely Being Director Or MD Does Not Attract Liability Under Drug And Cosmetics Act Without Specific Allegations: J&K&L High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that merely being a Managing Director or Director of a company does not make a person liable for prosecution under the Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940, in the absence of specific allegations ascribing a role in the commission of the offence. The Court clarified that the presumption under Section 34 of the Act arises only against the...
S. 27 Evidence Act | Recovery Of Weapon Meaningless Without Proof Linking It To Crime : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has set aside the murder conviction, after finding that the prosecution's recovery of evidence based on the accused's disclosure statements under Section 27 of the Evidence Act was riddled with inconsistencies, hostile witnesses, and a lack of forensic linkage. A bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Vipul M Pancholi observed that mere recovery of the...
CCS Pension Rules | Gratuity Can Be Withheld During Pendency Of Criminal Or Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employee : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has observed that an employer is entitled to withhold the payment of gratuity to an employee against whom a judicial or disciplinary proceeding is pending. A bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi dismissed an appeal filed by an ex-Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation Clerk, whose gratuity was withheld by the transport corporation because...
Kerala High Court Appoints Retd Justice VG Arun As Chairman Of High Power Committee For Implementing Sabarimala Master Plan
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday (April 7) appointed retired Justice V.G. Arun as the Chairman of the High Power Committee for implementation of the Sabarimala Master Plan.The Division Bench of Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V. and Justice K.V. Jayakumar noted that since the previous Chairman, Retd. Justice S. Siri Jagan, had passed away earlier this year, it was necessary to appointment a...
Baseless Allegations Of Wife's Prior Marriage No Bar To Relief Under DV Act; Wife Entitled To Maintenance: HP High Court
The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that mere allegations of a subsisting prior marriage, in the absence of any legally valid proof, cannot disentitle a woman from seeking relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Justice Sandeep Sharma remarked that: “Once marriage inter-se petitioner and respondent No.1 is admitted and no legal/valid document with regard...
Authorities Cannot Direct Removal Of "National" From Trust Name Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that authorities under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act do not have jurisdiction to direct a change in the name of a trust. The Court observed that the statutory scheme of the Act does not contemplate any enquiry into the suitability of the name of a trust, and therefore, no such power can be exercised by the authorities.Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh was hearing...