Consumer Cases

NCDRC Keeps In Abeyance Arrest Warrants Against Actor Salman Khan Over Alleged Misleading Advertisement
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in an interim order on Wednesday (April 8) has kept in abeyance bailable arrest warrants issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against actor Salman Khan, in a complaint alleging misleading advertisement by Rajshree Pan Masala starring the actor. The Commission also stayed all further proceedings against the actor...

Overdraft Facility Not Per Se Commercial Transaction: Delhi State Commission Sets Aside Dismissal Of Consumer Complaint
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President) and Ms. Bimla Kumari (Member), allowed an appeal against HDFC Bank, holding that the District Commission erred in dismissing the complaint on the ground of “commercial purpose”. The Commission observed that the mere availing of an overdraft facility does not, by itself, render...

South Delhi Consumer Commission Dismisses Medical Negligence Claim Against Max Hospital; Holds Insurer Liable For Deficiency Over Failure To Provide Repudiation Letter
The South Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Monika A. Srivastava (President) and Kiran Kaushal (Member), dismissed the complaint against Max Smart Super Speciality Hospital in relation to the allegation of medical negligence. The Commission, however, held United India Insurance Company liable for deficiency in service on account of its failure to...

EPFO Liable For Decade-Long Delay In PF Transfer; Chandigarh Commission Awards ₹50,000 Compensation
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Chandigarh (Amrinder Singh Sidhu, President and B.M. Sharma, Member) held the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) guilty of deficiency in service for causing an inordinate delay of nearly a decade in transferring the complainant's provident fund and directed it to pay ₹50,000 as compensation and litigation...

Consumer Law: Quarterly Digest 2026 (January To March)
Supreme Court NCDRC Decree Against Builder Company Can't Be Executed Against Directors/Promoters Without Personal Liability Fixed: Supreme Court Cause Title: ANSAL CROWN HEIGHTS FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) VS. M/S ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD PVT. LTD. & ORS. (and connected matters) Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 40 The Supreme Court on Monday (January 12) observed that...

Retention Of Fees Without Rendering Services Is Unfair Trade Practice: J&K Consumer Commission Orders Physics Wallah To Refund ₹35,000, Pay Compensation
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Baramulla/Bandipora, comprising Peerzada Qousar Hussain (President) and Nyla Yaseen (Member), has directed Physics Wallah Private Limited and its local coordinator to refund ₹35,000 and pay compensation to a complainant whose son was denied access to a NEET 2027 course despite full payment. The Commission observed that retention of...

Flight Cancellation Without Prior Intimation: Chandigarh State Commission Holds Air India, Travel Agent Liable
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, comprising Justice Raj Shekhar Attri (President) and Preetinder Singh (Member), held Air India and Alhind Tours and Travels lia-ble for deficiency in service for failing to inform the passenger of the flight cancellation. The Commission partly allowed the appeal and held that while the airline bears primary responsibility for...

Consumer Law Monthly Digest: March 2026
Supreme CourtConsumer Protection Act | Keeping Bank Deposit Not 'Commercial Purpose' Merely Because Interest Is Earned : Supreme CourtCause Title: SANT ROHIDAS LEATHER INDUSTRIES AND CHARMAKAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS VIJAYA BANKCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 267The Supreme Court on Thursday (March 19) observed that merely earning interest on bank deposits does not automatically...

Kottayam District Commission Holds Wedding Photographers Liable For Deficiency In Service; Orders ₹2.5 Lakh Compensation
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kottayam, comprising Manulal V.S (President), Smt. Bindhu R (Member) and Sri K.M. Anto (Member), held Piccolo Weddings and its proprietor liable for deficiency in service for failing to provide agreed wedding photography and videography services. The Commission allowed the complaint, observing that the lapses caused great mental agony...

J&K Consumer Commission Directs IndiGo To Pay ₹1.19 lakh For Loss Of Umrah Pilgrims' Baggage
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Baramulla/Bandipora, comprising Peerzada Qousar Hussain (President) and Nyla Yaseen (Member), has directed IndiGo Airlines to pay ₹1.19 lakh to two pilgrims returning from Umrah after one of their five checked-in bags was lost. The Commission observed that the airline's failure to properly handle and tag baggage, and its inability to trace...

Delhi Consumer Commission Issues Bailable Warrant Against Good Flipping Burgers Official For Non-Compliance Of Order
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, comprising Poonam Chaudhry (President) and Shekhar Chandra (Member), issued bailable warrants against an official of Good Flipping Burgers for failure to comply with its earlier order directing refund and payment of compensation to the complainant. Brief Facts The complainant, Raminder Kaur, placed online food orders on...

Maharashtra State Commission Directs Lodha Developers To Refund ₹2.83 Crore With Interest For Possession Delay, Unfair Trade Practice
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai comprising Poonam V. Maharshi (Presiding Member) and Mrs. Dr. Nisha Amol Chavhan (Member) held Lodha Developers Ltd liable for deficiency in service for failure to deliver possession and for demanding charges not specified in the initial agreement. The Commission partly allowed the complaint and held that retaining...
