LiveLaw High Courts Daily Highlights: October 30, 2026

  • LiveLaw High Courts Daily Highlights: October 30, 2026
    Listen to this Article
    1. Number Of Criminal Cases Alone Can't Justify Continued Police Surveillance: Rajasthan High Court
    2. Defamation Complaint Can't Be Referred To Police For Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC: Karnataka High Court
    3. Selecting Temple Pontiff Is Purely Religious Function, HR&CE Dept Has No Right To Appoint Or Approve Appointment: Madras High Court
    4. Madras High Court Issues Notice On Plea To Probe CJP Spokesperson Saurav Das' Background, Block Social Media Accounts
    5. Discouraging Parents From Reporting Child's Sexual Assault Not By Itself Offence Of Non-Reporting U/S 21 POCSO Act: Bombay High Court
    6. Two Separate Acts Of Touching Child's Breasts During Same Occurrence Constitute 'Aggravated Sexual Assault': Sikkim High Court
    7. State Can't Interpret Church Constitution To Decide Which Faction Has Religious Authority: Meghalaya High Court
    8. Instagram Account Deactivation Can't Be Challenged By Filing Writ Petition: Delhi High Court
    9. Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Appointment Of 5 Judicial Officers As Judges Of Madhya Pradesh High Court
    10. Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Six Names For Appointment As Chhattisgarh High Court Judges
    11. Vizhinjam Port : Kerala High Court Quashes Govt Order Forming Expert Committee To Examine Coastal Erosion
    12. Woman Who Tried To Throw Purse At Bombay High Court Judge Apologises
    13. Mere Filing Of Police Complaint Does Not Amount To Defamation: Delhi High Court
    14. Reminding Maharashtra Police Of Its Motto, Bombay High Court Declares Arun Ferreira's 2011 Arrest Illegal, Grants ₹2 Lakh Compensation
    15. Sanction To Prosecute Public Servant Can't Substitute Superior Officer's Report U/S 223(2) BNSS For PMLA Cognizance: P&H High Court
    16. Ashish Joshi Moves High Court Seeking Reasons For Repeated CAPF Deployment During Delhi Protests
    17. Video Conferencing Can Be Used To Cross-Examine Witness Unable To Travel Due To Sickness: Delhi High Court
    18. Madras High Court Directs Police To Monitor Online Content Targeting Judges, Bars Public Meetings Aimed At Intimidating Them
    19. POCSO Victim's Deposition Must Be Recorded In-Camera Even If She Attains Majority By The Time Trial Begins: Gujarat High Court
    Next Story