Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2026

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 228 to 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 272Nominal IndexAnil Baburao Baile vs Union of India, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 228Late Mahadev Dhondiba Marne vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 229Siesta Industrial & Trading Corporation vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 230Surendra Gadling vs Union of India, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 231Jhalak Constructions vs Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 232Santosh Chandrkant Potdar vs Bajaj Auto Limited, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 233Manjeet Singh vs Chief Controller Revenue Authority, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 234Nisha Pradeep Pandya vs Union of India, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 235Sashidhar Jagdishan vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 236Mohammed Arbaaz Aziz Farooqui vs Hiroo Hiranand Ragoowansi, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 237Bharat Aviation Pvt. Ltd. vs Rahul Sudhindra Soni, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 238Sambhaji Balkrishna Zambre vs Chhaya Balkrishna Zambre, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 239Chetan Dilip Paradhi vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 240Rubabuddin Shaikh vs Central Bureau of Investigation, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 241Yuvraj Santrao Bhole vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 242Rama Gunda Malkapure vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 243Vaijenath Haridas Ambad vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 244Rohit Bandu Nikalje vs The Regional Officer, UIDAI, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 245High Court On Its Own Motion vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 246Santosh Hiraman Lashkare vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 247D S Textiles vs IIFL Finance Limited, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 248Babasaheb Neelkanth Kalyani vs Sugandha Hiremath, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 249Maniar Ramesh Kumar vs CBI, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 250Kamalpushpa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 251Suresh Tulasiram Patilkhede vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 252Shakuntala T Amrutkar vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 253Vinaykumar Ashok Khatu vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 254Shubham Balasaheb Kardule vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 255The Goa Foundation vs State of Goa, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 256Geeta Kampani vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 257Court On Its Own Motion vs State Of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 258Aditi Sanjaysingh Bais vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 259Xavier Agnelo Minguel Jose Gracias vs State of Goa, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 260Sahyadri Shikshan Sanstha vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 261KBC vs BSC, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 262HRBK vs LRRK, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 263Mayur Sakharam Sawant vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 264Vinodkumar Chellappan Pillai vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 265Shekhar Kakasaheb Jagtap vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 266Unaided Schools Forum vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 267Mumbai Press Club vs Gurbir Singh, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 268Pradeep Rambhau Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 269MKJ vs LMJ, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 270N vs State of Maharashtra, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 271Unilever Plc vs Ashok Kumar, 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 272Final Orders/Judgments:Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Judgment Upholding Constitutional Validity Of UAPACase Title: Anil Baburao Baile vs Union of IndiaCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 228The Bombay High Court on Thursday (April 29) dismissed a petition seeking to review the judgment, by which the court upheld the validity of various provisions of the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). In July 2025, the High Court had held that the Act can be construed to be 'deterrent' to the commission of unlawful activities, but by no stretch of imagination can it be equated with 'preventive detention.'Bombay High Court Directs Probe Into Illegal Land Allotments For Temghar Dam Project; Orders Action Against Erring OfficialsCase Title: Late Mahadev Dhondiba Marne vs State of MaharashtraCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 229The Bombay High Court has directed an investigation into irregularities and illegal allotments of land in the Temghar Dam Project, and ordered that action be taken against officials responsible for such lapses. The Court observed that allotment of alternate land to project-affected persons was made without proper verification of entitlement and supporting records.Repair Permissions From BMC Do Not Prove Legality Of Structure: Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Against DemolitionCase Title: Siesta Industrial & Trading Corporation vs Municipal Corporation of Greater MumbaiCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Bom) 230The Bombay High Court has held that permissions granted by the Municipal Corporation for repairs or alterations do not establish the legality of a structure, nor do they prove its existence prior to the relevant cut-off date. The Court observed that such permissions, in the absence of independent proof, cannot be relied upon to legitimise unauthorised...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2026

Narsi Benwal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: May 2026

Narsi Benwal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers