Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2024: Part II [Citations 401 - 800]

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 401 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 800Whether Non-Filing Of 'Statement Of Truth' Along With A Petition U/S 34 Of A&C Act Makes The Filing Non-Est? Delhi High Court Refers Question To Larger Bench For Clarification In View Of Conflicting ViewsCase Title: BBNL v. Sterlite Technologies LtdCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 401The Single Bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has referred the question 'Whether non-filing of statement of truth with a Challenge Petition would make the filing non-est' to a larger bench in view of conflicting views taken by two Division Benches.Delhi High Court Asks Its Judges To Prioritize Criminal Cases, Appeals Against MPs, MLAsCase Title : COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v UNION OF INDIACitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 402The Delhi High Court has asked its judges to prioritise the criminal cases, appeals or revisions pending against MPs and MLAs.“…we direct the Registry of this Court to circulate this order to brother and sister Judges assigned with such cases so that priority is given to all criminal cases/appeals/revisions pending before them against the members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies, as it is essential for expeditious and effective disposal of such cases,” a division bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan said.Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL To Ban Cross Gender Massages In SpasTitle: SH. ANUJ MALHOTRA v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 403The Delhi High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation seeking a direction on the Delhi Government to ban cross-gender massages in spas or massage centres in the national capital.A division bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Singh Arora said that a single judge is already seized of the controversy and thus the PIL cannot be entertained.Delhi HC Refuses To Entertain PIL To Remove Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, Says Personal Interest Subordinate To National Interest But It's His CallTitle: VISHNU GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 404The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking removal of Arvind Kejriwal, who has been arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the liquor policy case, from the post of Chief Minister of Delhi.“At times, personal interest has to be subordinate to national interest. But that is his (Kejriwal's) personal opinion. If he does not want to do that it's upto him. We are a court of law…Do you have any precedent that president's rule or governor's rule has been imposed by the court?” a division bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan remarked. Retired Officer Cannot Be Termed As “Public Servant” Under Export Inspection Employees Rules, 1978: Delhi High CourtCase Name: Parveen Kumar vs Export Inspection Council & OrsCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 405A single judge bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Justice Tushar Rao Gedela while deciding a Civil Writ Petition in the case of Parveen Kumar vs Export Inspection Council & Ors has held that a retired officer appointed as Inquiry Officer does not fulfil the criteria of “public servant” under Rule 11(2) of the Export Inspection Employees (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1978 (EIA Rules).Delhi High Court Awards ₹244 Crores Damages To Ericsson In Suit Against Lava Over Patents InfringementTitle: LAVA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and other connected matterCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 406The Delhi High Court has awarded Rs. 244 crores damages to Ericsson in a suit filed by it against Lava International Limited over infringement of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs).Justice Amit Bansal acknowledged the transformative impact of the evolution of mobile telecommunications in India, which has opened up access to information and digital services, leading to a more connected and digitally empowered society.Delhi High Court Quashes Initiation Of Section 153C Assessment Proceedings Falling Beyond Maximum 10 Years Block PeriodCase Title: PCIT Versus Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 407The Delhi High Court has quashed the initiation of assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, which was falling beyond the maximum 10-year block period.Wife Leaving Matrimonial Home From Time To Time Without Husband's Fault Is Mental Cruelty: Delhi High CourtTitle: X v. YCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 408The Delhi High Court has said that the wife leaving the matrimonial home from time to time without any fault of the husband is an act of mental cruelty.A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna granted divorce to a husband on the ground of cruelty and desertion by the wife under Section 13 (1) (i- a) and 13 (1) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.Delhi High Court Criticizes JNU For 'Pre-Determined' Expulsion Of Student In 2011 Over Objectionable VideoTitle: Balbir Chand v Jawahar Lal Nehru UniversityCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) ...

Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2024: Part II [Citations 401 - 800]

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags